In taking measures against water pollution caused by domestic wastewater, it is necessary to consider both the financing of measures by local government, which bears the main responsibility for dealing with this probrem, and environmental conservation. In this paper, as an example of cost-effectiveness analysis of wastewater treatment alternatives (sewer and wastwater treatment, septic tank for both brown water and kitchen/bath wastewater, septic tank for brown water only) for the local government, the total cost allocation and pollution generation trends are calculated for each treatment alternative, and analyzed for sensitivity to changes in various parameters for a population of ten thousand people. As performance indicators of each treatment alternative, we chose total pollution loads generated in a planning period, time trends of cost allocated to national government, local government, and citizens.Under the current subsidy scheme used in Japan, there are various factors to be considered, policy of local government (amount of subsidy, sewer rates, combinations of alternative treatment methods), the behavior of people in area not served by sewers, and an estimate of population growth. This paper clarifies the effects of these factors on financing and the degree of reduction of pollution loads in regard to treatment alternatives.
View full abstract