The number of food trade disputes is increasing as countries are enforcing more stringent food safety measures. Since the WTO started in 1995, many of the traditional trade barriers such as tariff have been abolished. Instead, other protection regulations, such as non-tariff barriers, are increasing and becoming much complex. Now it is questioned whether food safety improvement is compatible with food trade expanding. This study examines two food trade disputes over beef safety under the WTO: the EU ban on U.S. hormone beef and the Japan-U.S. conflict over BSE beef. The paper analyzes the arguments and resolution process of the two cases and identifies problems of the system ensuring food safety improvement is compatible with food trade expanding. Findings suggest that classification of the causes and the resolution process of food safety-related trade dispute, analysis of the role & characteristics of SPS agreement, highlighting the arguments of the Beef Hormones dispute through scrutinizing the WTO dispute panel & Appellate Body reports along with the arguments and process of the Japan-US dispute over BSE beef in relation to the SPS agreement & OIE code, and clarifying remaining or unsolved problems in the WTO from the viewpoint of food safety and food trade are key.
View full abstract