In a 45-bed psychiatric closed ward, 168 schizophrenic patients were involved in 2-year token economy procedures. The target behaviors of token economy procedures were (1) to get up before 7 o'clock in the morning, change clothes and put one's bedclothes into a closet, (2) to set meals on the tables and (3) to rake a garden. In this study, A・B・C・A・C・A・C・D・A・C・E・A design was used, A: baseline phase, B: social reinforcement phase, C: immediate reinforcement phase, D: intermittent reinforcement phase, E: delayed reinforcement phase. Results were as follows. 1. Target behaviors (1) (a) When the baseline levels of the target behaviors were above 80%, token economy procedures were not effective in improving the target behaviors. (b) When the baseline levels were between 80% and 30%, token economy procedures were effective to some extent, but some kinds of reinforcement systems were needed to maintain the improvement of the target behaviors. (c) When the baseline levels were under 30%, token economy procedures were remarkably effective in improving the target behaviors. (d) When the delayed reinforcement phase followed after the immediate reinforcement phase, the target behaviors improved significantly. (e) In the reinforcement phase, patients whose involvement in token economy started from the reinforcement phase improved rapidly, compared with patients who were involved from the first baseline phase. 2. Target behavior (2) (a) Only when the baseline level was 0%, token economy procedures were slightly effective. (b) When the delayed reinforcement phase followed after the immediate reinforcement phase, the target behavior improved slightly. (c) In the reinforcement phase, patients whose involvement in token economy started form the reinforcement phase improved more than patients who were involved from the first baseline phase. 3. Target behavior (3) Token economy procedures were remarkably effective in improving the target behavior, but the length of this experiment was too short to draw any conclusions. 4. In the early stage of token economy procedures, patients who had saved many tokens performed many of the target behaviors, but in the latter stage, patients who had saved many tokens did not perform many of the target behaviors. 5. While the target behaviors (1) improved, the assessment methods (Psychiatric Evaluation Scale and Behavior Rating Scale) showed no improvement. 6. When the effectiveness of token economy procedures was investigated, the "token bound" which Woods et al described was important, and the "token bound" could be divided into 3 types based upon the comparison between the levels of the target behaviors in the first baseline phase, the reinforcement phase and the second baseline phase. (a) Type-1. When the levels in the first baseline phase were high, the levels in the first baseline phase and the reinforcement phase were higher than the second baseline phase (almost the same case Woods et al described). In this case, token economy procedures would not be useful. (b) Type-2. When the levels in the first baseline phase were intermediate, the levels in the reinforcement phase were higher than the first and the second baseline phases, and levels in the first and the second baseline phases were alnost the same. In this case, some kinds of reinforcement systems would be needed to maintain the improvement of the target behaviors. (c) Type-3. When the levels in the first baseline phase were low, the levels in the reinforcement phase were higher than the first and the second baseline phases, and the levels in the second baseline phase were higher than the first baseline phase. In this case,token bound" would occur only on a small scale, and thus, token economy procedures would be useful.
View full abstract