In order to establish a rational test of muscle function of the lower extremities using floor reaction force during sit to stand (STS) movement, we should study an appropriate number of sit to stand movements in a STS test with which we can rationally evaluate the leg strength function. However, related leg strength function and floor reaction force during STS movement may be different when the STS movement is performed once or repeatedly. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a difference and relation of floor reaction force between a single STS test and a STS test repeated 5 times. Ten young-adult male subjects participated in this study (age: 20-24). Subjects performed the STS movement only once or 5 times. In the single STS test, subjects performed the STS movement once, while in the repeated STS test, they repeated it in two kinds of movement, 5 times as rapidly as possible or in an ordered tempo. The single and each of the repeated STS tests were performed twice, respectively. In terms of each parameter, the mean value of the STS movement repeated 5 times and a value of the single STS test were compared. Significant differences in achievement time and impulse were observed, and it was larger in the single STS test. A significant correlation was observed only between peak values of floor reaction force of the single STS test and the repeated STS test. In conclusion, in the repeated STS test, and in both cases of the maximum-voluntary and tempo ordered repeated STS test, floor reaction forces in each trial were closely related with total value of that of five repeated movements and there was no difference in characteristic features of the floor reaction forces even in a different repeated style. However, characteristic features of floor reaction force of the single STS test were different from those of the repeated STS test and, in the latter, the movement was achieved more rapidly, more forcefully and with a smaller workload.
View full abstract