The application of Low reactive Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) for the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids has been already reported and investigated. According to these reports, LLLT for hypertrophic scars and keloids became routine very quickly. In recent years, the Proximal Priority Theory (PPT) for pain attenuation has become a routine approach. In this prospective study, we present the application of PPT for the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids and discuss comparisons between the original LLLT and PPT approaches. Subjects comprised 19 patients who were treated for hypertrophic scars and keloids, 8 patients in the PPT group and 11 patients in the LLLT group. Clinical photography of the lesions was performed, and 4 items were assessed for each lesion, namely Itching, Pain, Erythema and Hardness on an 11-point scale for each value. The actual measurement values in mm and cm
2 of 2 items, thickness and size, were used for the original LLLT group. Each treatment session consisted of direct application of an 830nm, 60mW, continuous wave, GaAlAs diode laser (Oh-lase 3D1, JMLL Tokyo Japan) to the lesions for 30 seconds to 2 minutes per lesion depending on the size and number of lesions existing on each patient, or while the attending clinician firmly pinched the lesion between fingers and thumb during laser therapy. For the PPT approach group, the laser was incident only to the neck as dictated by the theory. The pinching of the lesion was the same as in the original LLLT group. In both groups, a significant difference (p<0.05) between pretreatment and 5 treatment sessions was recognized, and a significant difference (p<0.05) between 5 treatment sessions and 10 treatment sessions was also recognized in the Erythema and Hardness items. There were no differences between the PPT group and LLLT group in most of the items, but LLLT achieved better improvement in the Erythema item after 5 treatment sessions, compared with PPT.
抄録全体を表示