The theoretical foundation of the national economic balance of the socialist society is laid on Marx's theory of reproduction. Marx's scheme, in which it is assumed that products are exchanged at their values, shows the reproductive mechanism of capitalist society in the abstract. It excludes the fixed capital which continues to function in its natural form, and does not directly contain the unproductive sphere of the national economy. But, the balance of the national economy must express in detail the concrete structure of reproduction of a socialist country. The balance of the Soviet national economy for the 1923/24 economic year, which was made up as a "turnover record" (oborotnaya vedomost'), did not explain the composition of the social product with respect to value, and therefore cannot give the analysis of the social relations and mechanism of consumption and accumulation, though it contained the fundamental elements of the intersectorial balance. In Strumilin's scheme of the balance of the Soviet national economy, the social product is divided with respect to value into three parts ; the first part replaces the production funds(c), the second is the value of the product for the individual(v), and the third is for the society(m). Further the production funds (fondy) are divided into two parts : osnovnye fondy and oborotnye fondy. This division of funds makes it possible to analyze more complicated mechanism of expanded reproduction, through which appear 1) the accelerated growth of the production of means of production, and 2) the distinction of "inter mediary product" and "final product". The connection between Marx's scheme and the national economic balance is established by the planned price near to value, which in turn can be calulated when the capitalist relations are denied and the socialist economy is established.

抄録全体を表示

On the eve of French Revolution, Normandie was known as one of the most industrial provinces in France for its cotton industry which was found extensively in those days in the privileged town of Rouen and its country districts, especially in the region of Caux. This industry had been depressed for several years under the industrial crisis after the Commercial Treaty between. France and England (1786), and through the social and economic disorder of the Revolution. But as the order was restored and the economic protectionism was established under the Consulat and the Premier Empire, the industrial prosperity was soon recovered by the introduction of machinism (=mainly spinning machines, for example, jennies, mules)-which was the real beginning of the Industrial Revolution in France. Therefore, it is in the Normandie cotton industry in the latter half of the 18th century that we can research the economic and social pre-conditions of the Industrial Revolution in France. The aim of this study is to make these conditions clear, inquiring into the points as follows : (1) What were the fundamental characteristics of the production system of the Normandie cotton industry? (2) During the Ancien Regime industries were mainly controled by privileged towns which chiefly promote the economic policy of the Monarchy; and in Normandie Rouen was the privileged town. With the development of the Normandie cotton industry, how did this role of Rouen change? (3) How had the economic conditions of the introduction of machinism grown out of the Normandie cotton industry in the end of the 18th century?

抄録全体を表示

周知のように,再生産表式における資本循環と貨幣流通のそれぞれについて,マルクスははっきりした見解をとっている.すなわち,再生産表式分析における資本循環は商品資本の循環範式によらねばならぬとされており,貨幣流通に関しては「出発点への還流の原則」が指摘されている.しかしながら,再生産表式分析のなかで,資本循環と貨幣流通が相互にどのような関係にあるかは,マルクス自身重視した点であったけれども,はっきりと説明されておらず,その後の再生産論研究でも十分に解明されていない.本論はこの欠陥を若干なりとも補う意図のもとに,再生産表式分析における資本循環と貨幣流通との関連について一試論を提出することを目的としている.

抄録全体を表示