The Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology
Online ISSN : 2186-3075
Print ISSN : 0021-5015
ISSN-L : 0021-5015
Volume 25, Issue 2
Displaying 1-12 of 12 articles from this issue
  • Kiyoshi Amano
    1977Volume 25Issue 2 Pages 73-84
    Published: June 30, 1977
    Released on J-STAGE: February 19, 2013
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    The purpose of the present study was to examine the method and the possibility of teaching moderately mentally retarded (MR) children to read Japanese syllabic characters (Kanamoji) through the formation of the act of analyzing the syllabic structure of words (ASSW).
    In experiment 1, which aimed at ascertaining the development of coordination and its relation to the acquisition of the act of ASSW, the following tasks were given to 6 to 12-year-old moderately MR and 3-4 year-old normal children. Tasks: 1) a reading test of kana-moji, 2) an articulation test, 3) the task of articulating and separating words into-syllables, 4) the task of clapping hands rhythmically coordinating with a series of pulses, 5) the tasks of moving hands in reciprocal coordination, 6) the tasks of pronouncing syllables of given words one at a time in sequence at intervals of 0.3, 1.0 and 2.0 sec.
    As results, the following facts were ascertained: 1) MR children's insufficient ability of ASSW proved to be related to poor coordinate function and articulatory disorders. 2) Although even a child with extremely poor coordinate function and with severe disorder in articulation was found to be able to articulate syllables of a word in sequence coresponding one to one to hand claps, as long as the syllabic structure of the word was simple such as mama, papa, momo (a peach) 3) Children who had not acquired the act of ASSW, proved to be unable to pronounce each syllable of the words aloud in sequence at longer interval (2.0 sec.) without the help of vocal-coordinating motor acts. 4) The main determinant of dfficulty of the tasks of separating a word into syllables, was found to be the length of the pause between syllables pronounced. This experiment brought us the following hypothesis: Learning to separate words into syllables in the tasks which demand the longer interval, will not only make a child separate words more precisely, but also cause him to pay voluntary attention to the syllabic components of words.
    Experiment 2: Bassed on these facts and hypothesis, the following 4 steps training program was constructed for moderately MR children in preparation to the formation of the act of ASSW. 1) A child learns to separate the words into syllables, clapping his hands. 2) He learns to separate the words into syllables, jumping into circles one after another. 3) He learns to syllabify the words, putting small wooden dolls on bases placed at 10cm intervals, pronouncing one syllable for each doll. Then the intervals are made gradually longer; 30cm, 50 cm, 1m, 2m. Then he learns to abstruct the first and/or last syllable of words. 4) He learns to construct a word, putting small wooden kana-blocksone at a time on the same characters below the picture of the word, pronuncing the syllable.
    And 3 steps training program was prepared to teach them to read and construct words in Kanamoji. According to these programs, nineteen moderately MR school children from 6 to 12 years old, who had no knowledge of kana-moji and had not yet acquired the act of ASSW, were trained individually and/or in small groups.
    As a result, most MR children (9 out of 11) with no deficiency in speech proved to be able to learn the act of ASSW. And as for children with severe speech deficiency, 3 out of 8 children had acquired this act in training period. Out of 11 children who acquired the act of ASSW, eight underwent the training of Kanamoji. As a result, most of them (7 out of 8) showed rapid progress in learning to read Kanamoji. These experiments suggest the high possibility of teaching MR children to read Kanamoji under the condition of elaborated training program.
    Download PDF (2042K)
  • in relation to programmed learning
    Toshio Okamoto
    1977Volume 25Issue 2 Pages 85-96
    Published: June 30, 1977
    Released on J-STAGE: February 19, 2013
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    From the standpoint of state-trait anxiety theory by Spielberger, the learning behavior under the conditions of two programmed materials whose frame sequences are different in a stage was analyzedin this study.
    One of two programmed materials used in the experiment was designed logically for the frame sequence in a stage, the other was designed at random. But the stage sequences of two programmes were the same.
    165 junior high school boys in 1st grade were divided into 18 groups in consideration of 1) two programme structures, 2) three levels (H, M, L) of the strength of state-anxiety, and 3) three levels (H, M, L) of the strength of trait-anxiety.
    At first the state-anxiety scale was composed, corresponding to S-scale of STAI (by Spielberger). This scale included three factors, such as 1) tiredness, 2) interest (excitement), and 3) tension (apprehension).
    And then as the corresponding T-scale of STAI, 9 items meaning test anxiety in AMT (by Shimoyama) were used.
    Through this experiment procedure, the present study aimed at investigating the cause of inducing state-anxiety and its function, on programmed learning.
    The main results were as follows:
    1) Under the situation on programmed learning by the random-structured materials, high state-anxiety was apt to be induced.
    2) Especially, the Ss of high trait-anxiety hadthe tendency in such a situation to stress as the random-structured materials.
    3) High state-anxiety disturbed the balance of learning behavior, and consequently the performance level decreased.
    4) The multiple regression model of state-anxiety was determined by the learning of time, the number of error-responses, and the strength of trait-anxiety. But the estimated degree of this model was not so high (Index of determination =0.260).
    Download PDF (1766K)
  • Kayoko Inagaki
    1977Volume 25Issue 2 Pages 97-103
    Published: June 30, 1977
    Released on J-STAGE: February 19, 2013
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    The ‘construct validity’ of curiosity rating by teachers, using five behavioral criteria (See TABLE, 1), was examined. First, relationships between curiosity rating by teachers, and exploratory behaviors observed in specific situations and performances on intellectual tasks requiring exploration, were investigated among 51 kindergarteners with a mean age of 5 years 10 months. Secondly, it was examined whether curiosity rating by kindergarten teachers for 37 of the above subjects would be able to predict first-grade school achievement, which was considered to indicate the performances in complex learning permitting children to explore to some degree.
    The results were as follows: curiosity rating by teachers was significantly related to the performances on intellectual tasks involving exploration, i. e., test performance for exploratory learning and accuracy of visual matching, and partial correlation between curiosity rating by teachers and test performance for exploratory learning was still significant when verbal ability was held constant. However, teacher rating of curiosity was not highly correlated with exploratory behaviors observed in specific situations.(See TABLE 2)
    These findings were interpreted as follows: curiosity rating by teachers reflected product-oriented curiosity, which differed from process-orientedcuriosity. Product-oriented curiosity was regarded as a tendency to explore efficiently in order to produce excellent performances and was expected to be closely related to verbal ability or intelligence. On the other hand, process-oriented curiosity was consideredas a tendency to engage in ‘self-sustaining’ exploration, and was expected to appear as exploratory behaviors observed in situations requiring no special demands.
    This interpretation was supported by the findings from the longitudinal study, that is, curiosityrating by teachers was highly correlated with first-grade school achievement, whereas the variety of exploratory behaviors in a specific situation (‘object curiosity’ score) was not (See TABLE 3).
    Some directions of future research on the process-product distinction in curiosity were discussed.
    Download PDF (1224K)
  • A PROCESS OF SPEECH TRAINING
    Akitsugu Hirata
    1977Volume 25Issue 2 Pages 104-115
    Published: June 30, 1977
    Released on J-STAGE: February 19, 2013
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    Behavior therapy techniques were applied to the therapeutic education of an 8-year-old mute autistic boy from January 1969 to June 1970 by the author. This paper intends to describe the process of verbal behavior formation training for the child. At the first step, playing at seesaw with the child contingently after his spontaneous meaningless vocalizations, the author succeeded in strengthen his vocalizations. Subsequently the author tried to shape those vocalizations into a word yaritai (wanna do), using successive approximation method. It took 13 sessions (almost 2 months) for him to speak yaritai clearly. Contrary to the author's expectation, he did not show much progress in using the word which he had acquired ; also another speech training through conditioning generalized imitation proved to be very difficult for him. On the other hand, the author found that the child's behavior system, which might support the verbal behavior, had not been well formed and he stayed on the sensory-motor intelligence level. Then, as a second step, author devised teaching sequence based on sensory-motor training. At first, the child was trained to fit the form-boards, and the problems were gradually made more and more difficult ; i. e., he was required to discriminate forms or sizes between several form-boards presented simultaneously before him. Through that training, he modified his stiff manipulatory responses and acquired a well-coordinated sensory-motor system. Furthermore, with modified WGTA, extensive discrimination learning training of forms, colors, and sizes between vavious visual stimuli was also given and the child showed significant progress and acquired the discrimination learning set. After the formboards training, the child got the set to lay the objects on their appropriate pictures through systematic picture-picture matching training. As a final goal, the letters-objects matching training was introduced. The training consisted of fading in he letters as final cues and fading out the pictures as prompts. As a result, letters-objects matching behavior was almost errorlessly established, and the child was able to use letters as the signs of corresponding objects.
    The behavior characteristics of autistic children were also discussed. A hypothesis, that stereotypic behaviors and the tendencies to keep the sameness were caused by the spontaneous fear to excessively novel or complex stimuli, was proposed. For, some disorders in the orienting response system (including orienting reflexes and voluntary investigatory activities) prevented the assimilation and accommodation processes of autistic children. Consequently, adaptation level formed through prior experience did not reach as high as those of normal children. Therefore, even interesting and approach-investigation provoking stimuli which were optimally discrepant from adaptation level for normal children might extraordinarily be discrepant for autistic children and make them avoid those stimuli and cause the peculiar withdrawal syndrome. In this discussion an attempt was mabe to show the importance of sensory-motor training for severely retarded autistic children.
    Download PDF (2174K)
  • Michie Doi
    1977Volume 25Issue 2 Pages 116-126
    Published: June 30, 1977
    Released on J-STAGE: February 19, 2013
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    The purpose of the investigation was to examine the effect of stimulus verbalization on the performance of multicative classification tasks, using5, 6, and 8 year-old children.
    Two experiments were designed.
    In Exp. I, the subjects were presented with a series of 10 2 X 2 matrices consisting of values from 2 dimensions of color, form, size, and number, and were required to complete the empty cell of the matrix with the relevant stimulus. The basic design was a 2 (verbalization or perceptual identification to the stimuli of matrix) X 2 (verbal response or perceptual selection from alternatives for empty cell) X 3 (age levels of 5, 6, and 8 year-old) factorial, resulting in four treatment conditions for each age level.
    In Exp. II, 6 year-old children who could not solve multicative classification problems were train ed on two different training conditions. In one tr aining condition, the subjects were demanded the verbalization of matrix elements for the dimensional value as in Exp. I, and they received visual feedback of a correct stimulus, i. e., verbal training, while in another training the subjects were only shown th e visual feedback of the correct stimulus, i. e., nonverbal training. After reaching the learning criteri on, the transfer effects of the training on the two kinds of new matrices were examined.
    The results were as follows:
    In Exp. I, the performance level of multicative classification tasks showed that it signific antly improved with age. The effects of 2 variables on task performance, however, were found solely in 6 yearold children ; while 8 year-old children showed high level of performance in all conditions, 5 year-old children did low level of performance. For 6 year-old children, verbalization and verbal response to matrices element facilitated the performance of tasks. As regards this result, the effect on the task performance increased more when the condition of stimulus verbalization was associated to that of the verbal response condition. In addition, for the groups of stimulus verbalization, the pattern of error and response justification differed from other groups.
    In Exp. II, the group of verbal training reached the learning criterion significantly faster than the group of nonverbal training. As to the effects of the training on the transfer tasks, the verbal training condition facilitated significantly the performance of both kinds of transfer tasks more than the non verbal training condition, particularly to the matrices consisting of new stimuli, while nonverbal training facilitated solely the transfer tasks consisting of the same stimulus elements as those used in the training session.
    In view of the results described above, the role of verbal stimuli in the processes of solving multicative classification task was discussed.
    Download PDF (1840K)
  • a study on category scales
    Kijun Oda
    1977Volume 25Issue 2 Pages 127-137
    Published: June 30, 1977
    Released on J-STAGE: February 19, 2013
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    It is said that the category-words of a category scale must be differenciated from each other in strength of their semantic meanings and be arranged in order of strength of their semantic meanings. If the category-words not differenciated from each other in strength of their semantic meanings are used to construct a category scale, inconsistency may occur between the category-word order of the given category scale and the category-word order of the semantic meanings understood by the subjects and their judgment process with the category scale may be confused.
    The purpose of this study is to investigate the order effects of category-words on the subjects' judgment process with category scales which include the category-words undifferentiated from each other in strength of the semantic meanings.
    From our experiment, we get the following results:
    (1) The category-word order of a category scale must fulfill the following conditions:
    A. Expressive validity: The category-word order of a category scale must possess an expressive consistency.
    a. Example of the category scale with the high expressive validity. _??_
    b. Example of the category scale without the validity. _??_
    B. Validity of strength of semantic meanings: The category-words of a category scale must be differenciated from each other in strength of th e semantic meanings. Dochiratomoienai (neither long nor short) and amarinagakunai (not so long) should not be included in the same category scale, because the significant difference in strength of their. semantic meanings is not found between the words -55% of the 327 students judged “dochiratomoienai (neither long nor short)” is longer thri “amarinagakunai (not so long)” in paired comparison (X2=3.12, P>0.05)-.
    C. Validity of category-word order: The category-words of a category scale must be arranged in order of strength of their semantic meanings.
    Judgment process with a category scale which does not fulfill these three conditions must be confused.
    (2) when a category scale which possesses the high expressive validity but lacks the validity of strength of the semantic meanings is given, the subjects have a strong tendency to judge according to the category-word order of the given category scale.
    (3) When the category-word order of a category scale possessing the high validity of strength in the semantic meanings is not identical with the category-word order of strength of the semantic meanings understood by the subjects, the subjects rearrange the category-word order of the category scale according to their semantic understanding. So the expressive validity and the validity of strength of the semantic meanings are more important factors th an the validity of the category-word order in order to construct a category scale.
    Download PDF (1734K)
  • 1977Volume 25Issue 2 Pages 144-
    Published: 1977
    Released on J-STAGE: February 19, 2013
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
  • 1977Volume 25Issue 2 Pages 144a-
    Published: 1977
    Released on J-STAGE: February 19, 2013
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
  • 1977Volume 25Issue 2 Pages 144b-
    Published: 1977
    Released on J-STAGE: February 19, 2013
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
  • 1977Volume 25Issue 2 Pages 144c-
    Published: 1977
    Released on J-STAGE: February 19, 2013
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
  • 1977Volume 25Issue 2 Pages 144d-
    Published: 1977
    Released on J-STAGE: February 19, 2013
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
  • 1977Volume 25Issue 2 Pages 144e-
    Published: 1977
    Released on J-STAGE: February 19, 2013
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
feedback
Top