The aim of the present study was to test the cue-association hypothesis in young children's simultaneous discrimination learning. The study consisted of three experiments (Experiment I, II, III). Experiments I and II tested the assumption that the more overtraining Ss were given, the more firmly a cue-association between stimuli of two independent discrimination tasks was established from the cue-association hypothesis.
In Experiment I, a 2×4 factorial design was used, which incorporated reversal shift types (W and P) and degrees of overtraining (0, 12, 24, and 36 trials). Ss were 64 young children (4; 8years old). The main results were as follows: (1) Group W, in which both tasks were reversed, showed a tendency for reversal learning on_??_-_??_task to become faster as amount of overtraining increased, but Group P, in which_??_-_??_task was reversed, but _??_-_??_task was unreversed, showed a tendency for reversal learning on_??_-_??_task to become slower as the amount of overtraining increased.(2) Group P showed a tendency for errors on the unreversal task to increase as the amount of overtraining increased.
In experiment 11, Ss were 32 young children (4; 11 years old). The main results were as follows: (1) Group OT-O took significantly more trials to criterion than Groups OT-12, 0T-24, and OT-36 in shift learning, in which Ss were concurrently trained on two new pairs of stimuli: one pair of stimuli consisted of a positive stimulus of_??_-_??_task and a negative one of_??_-_??_task. and another of a positive stimulus of_??_-_??_task and a negative one of_??_-_??_task. But there were nondifferences among these three groups (OT-12, 0T-24, OT-36).(2) Group OT-O made fewer correct responses on the test than other three groups, but there were nondifferences among the other three groups.
In experiment 111, it was investigated how responses to a positive stimulus (S+) and a negative one (S-) change at criterion and following overtraining in simultaneous single task discrimination learning. A 4×2 factorial design was used, which incorporated transfer types (PC, NC, RPPC, RNNC) and degrees of overtraining (O and 24 trials). Ss were 64 young children (4;11 years old). The main results were as follows: (1) The transfer learning of Group NC, in which the positive stimulus was retained, and the negative one was replaced by new stimulus, and Group PC, in which the negative stimulus was retained, and the positive one was replaced by new stimulus, were significantly facilitated by overtraining.(2) Groups PC and NC took significantly fewer trials than Groups RPPC, in which the positive stimulus was reversed and the negative one was replaced by new stimulus (as a positive stimulus), and RNNC, in which the negative stimulus was reversed and the positive one was replaced by new stimulus (as a negative stimulus) under the overtraining condition. There were nondifferences in the trials to criterion between Groups PC and NC, and between Groups RPPC and RNNC under the overtraining condition.(3) Correct responses on the test in every group increased as a result of overtraining.(4) There were nondifferences in the correct responses on the test among these four groups under the overtraining condition.
These results demonstrated that a cue-association, established during overtraining, became stronger as amount of overtraining increased, and that the stimulus control of the positive stimulus on discrimination performance became equal to one of the negative stimulus as a result of overtraining, and that ORE in single discrimination task learning situation could be thoroughly explained by the cueassociation hypothesis.
View full abstract