The purpose of the present study was to investigate how professionals who are not associated with the fields of psychology or education counsel their clients. The specific example in the present study was legal counseling. Conversations between lawyers and their clients in 12 actual cases of practical legal counseling were recorded. Member check procedure was carried out in discussion with legal professionals. Results from an analysis of the lawyers' verbal behavior, using a grounded theory approach, revealed 15 categories, which were merged into 6 higher-order categories:(1) sharing problems,(2) sympathy,(3) transmitting judgments,(4) persuasion/counteraction,(5) promoting clients' understanding, and (6) concluding the interview. The conseling focused on sharing information about the clients' problems and transmitting the professionals' judgment. In addition, the data revealed sympathy as the basic attitude of the relationship, and also counteraction against clients' inappropriate goal setting and speculation, and approaches that promoted the clients' understanding. The categories in the present study, derived from the practical field of legal counseling, demonstrate characteristics of professional counseling that have not been dealt with adequately in the “helping” model.
View full abstract