It is expected that the motor response requiring both speed and accuracy is affected by the redundancy of stimulus events. This study was planned to examine the effects of redundancy in successive stimulus series (S) upon motor responses (R) with high S-R compatibility.
In Experiment I, subjects used were children. of four different ages (7, 9, 11, 13 years old) and college students, with N of 5 each. The subject was requnired to perform key-pressing responses under six different stimulus series (or conditions), with high redundancy (about 70%) in varying orders (1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th or 0 order). In each condition was given 300 trials with an inter-time interval of 5 sec. and reaction time (RT) and number of error was observed.
The main results were:
1. Improvement in log RT was found under the 1st and 2nd order conditions in all age groups. Improvement in log RT was shown under the 3rd order condition only for the 3 older groups and that under the 4th and 5th order conditions only for the college groups. However, log RT in later stages of training in younger subjects was related only with the 2nd order redundancy, and that in older subjects only with the 2nd and the 3rd order redundancy, higher for the 2nd than for the 3rd order. This finding indicates that improvements in higher order redundancy conditions must be attributed to the effects of lower order redundancy components.
2. The effects of the 3rd order redundancy in younger subjects did not appear and that in older subjects appeared only after 200 trials. It shows that use of a good number of trials are needed for the higher order redundancies to be effective, and there are age differences in using redundancy.
3. Linear relationships were found between errors and the 2nd order redundancy only in 11 years old.
The purpose of Experiment II was to explore the possibility that the 3rd order redundancy can be efficiently used. Subjects used were 6 graduate students and the subjects performed the task under six different conditions (2000 trials each): (1) the 2nd order redundancy of 68%,(2) the 2nd order redundancy of 30%,(3) the 3rd order redundancy of 73 % (4) the 3rd order redundancy of 80%,(5) the 3rd order redundancy of 39%,(6) zero order. Otherwise the procedure was identical to that in Experiment I.
The main results were:
1. Linear regressions were found between log RT and the 2nd and 3rd order redundancy with similar coefficients of determination, but with a slightly steeper slope for the 2nd order redundancy. Improvement in log RT under 3rd order high redundant conditions could not produce improvement under 2nd order high redundant condition. These events hint that the effects of the 2nd order redundancy are stronger than that of 3rd order redundancy.
2. Log RT of 3rd order high redundant conditions deviated in faster side of the regression line to the 2nd order redundancy, and in slower side of the regression line to the 3rd order. Log RT of the 2nd and 3rd order low redundant conditions deviated in slower side of both the regression lines. These facts suggest that the 2nd order components were used efficiently in the 3rd order high redundant conditions, but the 3rd order components were not used efficiently, and that any order components were not used efficiently in conditions contained low redundancy in any order.
View full abstract