A
AACR＝Anglo-American cataloguing rules. 1967.
　　　· JAE-UK-MP (1970). p. 4: 9: 12: 53: 59: 66:105 (bibliography II. other items refered to in the text.17):
Abbreviations
　　　· HT-CFIBCE (1966). p. 27-28 (#6. Abbreviations): manual filing rules:
　　　· HJP-CLIS (1970). p. 23: Chapter 6.3:
　　　· Arranged abbreviations as if spelled in full in the language of the entry, except for U.S., U.N., Gt. Brit., Mrs., and N.T. in Bible entries. Abbreviations such as K.K., K., I., R. at the beginning of the names of foreign learned societies and academies should be disregarded.
　　　　Dr. Austin's guests, Doctor Bard of Hyde Park,
　　　　Dr. Benjamin Franklin's library,
　　　　Mr. Fathful, Minister Fish Kelly, Mistress Anne.
　　　(HT-CFIBCE (1966). p.27-28 (#6. Abbreviations)):
Abbreviations, written out
　　　· HT-CFIBCE (1966). p.18 (12-21: #d.): preparation of catalog entries for filing: numeral and abbreviations:
　　　· Numerals and abbreviations which are to be filed as though they were spelled out (recommended ALA practice) must be written in full. This procedure should be followed, except for U.S., U.N., and Gt. Brit., N.T. and O.T. for Bible entries (filed as abbreviations for reasons of space); Mrs., which few readers visualize in the ALA form of “Mistress”. Where abbreviations are filed on, appropriate cross references must be made. The ampersand (&), numerals, abbreviations in titles must be written out in the language of the entry. (HT-CFIBCE (1966). p. 18 (12-21: #d.)):
Abstract bulletin, technical
　　　· see—Technical Abstract Bulletin: HRM-HDPL (1970). p. 36: 589: 862:
Abstracting
　　　· HRM-HDPL (1970). p.754: 764: 774:
Abstracting, automatic
　　　· see—Automatic abstracting: AS-ICIS (1968). p.129:
Abstracts, historical
　　　· see—Historical Abstracts: HRM-HDPL (1970). p.588:
Abstracts of documents
　　　· HJP-CLIS (1970). p.38: 71:
Academic libraries, cataloguing problems
　　　· JAE-UK-MP (1970). p.53:
Academies, learned, names of, initials in
　　　· see—initials in names of learned academies. HT-CFIBCE(1966). p. 28 (3-5: #Abbreviations): computer filing of index, bibliographies, and catalog entries:
Acess
　　　· CNSM-OHBRC (1968). p. 2: 59: 95: 116:
　　　· HRM-HDPL (1970). p.663:
Access, direct
　　　· see—direct access: CNSM-OHBRC (1968). p. 2: 19: 79-80: 94-99: 100-101: 116: 123: 133-134: see also—random access: HRM-HDPL (1970). p. 8: 22: 24: 344: 360: 372:
Access, direct, storage media
　　　· see—direct access storage media: AS-ICIS (1968). p.80-83:
Access, file, use of keys in
　　　· see—use of keys in file access: HJP-CLIS (1970). p.24:
Access, files, random
　　　· EJ-CS-IL (1971). p. 76:

View full abstract

Summay
　Through this investigation the author obtained the following results about the interest of newspaper readers.
　1. A lively concern is entertained for the current topics such as prices, politics, school education, environmental hazards, food problems, economic circles, etc.
　2. A great difference of the interest in the community is not seen between the local news readers seemingly much interested in the sources of information as to their community and those of the national leading newspapers.
　3. Searching and keeping the scraps largely depend on the estimation of their utiIity.
　4. The estimation does not come so much from the terms of profit or usefulness as awareness to the utility in the sense of desiring for personal culture. Culture-desiring readers are to be divided into the two types: one concerning for daily life and the other interested in cultural subjects.
　5. The news items estimated to be useful are often given in serial form.

View full abstract