農村計画学会誌
Online ISSN : 1881-2309
Print ISSN : 0912-9731
ISSN-L : 0912-9731
34 巻, 2 号
選択された号の論文の12件中1~12を表示しています
特集 研究と計画と実践~そのジレンマ・トリレンマ
特集基調論考
特集論考
論文
  • -北海道における市町村段階の農地保有合理化法人を対象として-
    高山 太輔, 正木 卓, 中谷 朋昭, 堀部 篤
    原稿種別: 論文
    2015 年 34 巻 2 号 p. 151-159
    発行日: 2015/09/30
    公開日: 2016/09/30
    ジャーナル フリー
    Past studies establish that the Agricultural Land Holding Rationalization Corporation (ALHRC) reduces transaction cost and promotes land liquidation through farmland leasing. This study evaluates the impact of the introduction of ALHRC on farmland liquidation in Hokkaido by using the difference-in-differences method. The result indicates that the rate of farmland leasing increased from 3-4 percent in the communities where ALHRC was introduced.
  • 藤田 紀之, 服部 俊宏, 東 淳樹, 尾上 舞, 矢澤 正人, 瀬川 典久
    原稿種別: 論文
    2015 年 34 巻 2 号 p. 160-166
    発行日: 2015/09/30
    公開日: 2016/09/30
    ジャーナル フリー
    For developing a policy to control a crow population, we determined a planning area based on the characteristics of the Minimum convex polygon (MCP) method. The calculated MCP home-range size indicates that control policy measures should be conducted in conjunction with neighboring municipalities. We also used the fixed kernel method to estimate crow's core area, and then determined the land-use characteristics of this area. Crows used Lefy residential area, forest, fruits farm in Summer, they used fruits farm, urban area, forest in Autumn, and they used urban area, fuits farm, forest, grass farm in winter.
  • -東日本大震災発生から1年半後のコミュニティに着目して-
    中島 正裕, 川副 早央里, 塩田 光, 大矢根 淳
    原稿種別: 論文
    2015 年 34 巻 2 号 p. 167-176
    発行日: 2015/09/30
    公開日: 2016/09/30
    ジャーナル フリー
    After the Great East Japan Earthquake, a large number of earthquake and tsunami victims were forced to live in temporary housing. This paper examines living conditions in temporary housing in Ishinomaki City, Miyagi prefecture. Ishinomaki City was one of the areas severely hit by the tsunami and 134 temporary housing complexes were built, the largest number anywhere in this disaster. We categorized 134 complexes by size, location, type of method of relocation and establishment of complex community association, and then carried out a questionnaire survey at 20 temporary housing complexes. As a result of the survey, we concluded that the living conditions, community formation, and neighborhood communication and opinions regarding their future differed according to the typology and/or characteristics of temporary housing complexes and types of residents. The results will contribute to verifying the effectiveness of constructing temporary housing in disaster areas from a locational planning viewpoint and to recording the challenges faced and the degree of success achieved in restoring livelihoods in a post-disaster situation.
feedback
Top