A new pressure distribution formula in typhoon fields is proposed which represents accurately the shape of typhoon pressure fields in their various stages, and also will be capable of being adopted for practical usage. This new formula is derived from an improvement on several well-known pressure formulas.
The above pressure functions have been p roposed by several authors, Schloemer's (1), Takahashi's (2), Bjerknes' (3) and Fujita's (4). These functions are shown in Fig.1 in normalized scale. Those functions contain only one parameter γ
0, which is used as a non-dimensional parameter on distance r and is related to the position of the maximum pressure gradient, γ
max. The characteristics of the curves, P(γ
0) and P(γmax) are given in Table 1. It is a weak point of them that the property of these pressure curve is not altered by a change of γ
0 which is estimated from a distribution of the observed data. Then a satisfactory goodness of hitting by use of them can not be expected especially when the pressure fields of a typhoon change with the stages of its life cycle.
An improvement on the pressure function was planed by Fujita introducing another parameter “a” of Eq. (5) to avoid the weak point mentioned above in his Eq. (4). It was too complicate to hit the curve (5) for the observed data.
We will try to improve these pressure functions by introducing some parameters which add freedom to them. Firstly, these functions are analyzed mathematically to show that they can be derived from a few well-known fundamental differential equations describing the so-called “growth process”. Secondly, as the mathematical background for the formulation of these curves is made clear, some methods for their improvement are examined under conditions where the assumption from which these functions are derived is maintained.
Though the linear assumption in (7) gives Schloemer's formula (1), a more general rule for the formulation of (1) is given by the differential Eq. (9). This can be called the pressure gradient equation, which expresses that the pressure gradient is in proportion to the deviation of pressure from the stationary state Pc and that the proportional constant gives the value of -γ
0. The subsequent discussion is developed by use of the pressure gradient equation. The solution of Eq. (9) is shown schematically in Fig.2. As the integration constant in (9) is fully utilized to formulate the equation (1), there is no room for any improvement on (1).
When the transformation (12) is i ntroduced, Takahashi's (2) and Bjerknes' (3) are expressed by the straiget lines in Fig.3. The pressure gradient equations for them are given by (15), which represents the pressure gradient proportion to the product between the decrease from the Pand the increase from the P. The proportional constants in (15) are related to the power of the main term, (γ/γ
0) in (2) and (3). This equation is analogous to the second order of reaction in the field of chemistry. The solution of (15)is shown schematically in Fig.4, which is called a (symmetrical) logistic curve. The pressure functions (2) and (3) are derived from Eq. (15) under the restriction that the parameter γ
0 must be chosen to make the integral constant C=0 in (15), and that n in (15) is determined a priori as n=1 for Takahashi's and as n=2 for Bjerknes'.
View full abstract