The efficiency-reduced temperature (η-T^*) curve of the tested collector unit, which was composed of evacuated glass tubes of 100mm outer-diameter and flat-tube absorbers coated with selective surface, was described by η=0.94-0.22T^*-0.01T^<*2>, where T^* means U_0(T_m-T_a)/I, T_m being average temperature of heat transfer fluid in the collector, T_a: ambient temperature, I: solar insolation, and U_0: nondimensionalizing coefficient of 10W/m・℃. The test was conducted by GIRI Nagoya procedure which was slightly modified from NBS/ASHRAE procedures. The η intercept (η_0) of 0.94 was larger than the calculated value, (0.78), based upon transmittance of the glass tube and solar absorptance of the absorber plate. The absorption of solar radiation reflected by the ground surface behind the absorber plate and also the absorption of diffuse solar radiation from the sky behind it caused the increment of about 0.12 from the calculated η_0 value of 0.78. The deviation of each (η-T^*) datum from its performance curve was relatively small compared with those of flat plate single and/or double glazing collectors, because the effect of changes of environmental conditions such as wind speed, ambient temperature, and incident solar radiation on the efficiency of collector at a fixed T^* value was relatively small as predicted by the heat transfer calculation applied to simple model of tubular collector under the ad hoc assumptions. For instance, the change of climatic conditions ranged from (v=1m/s, T_a=20℃, I=850W/m^2) to (v=3, T_a=30, I=950) caused an efficiency variation by only 0.015 at T^*=0.7 for the evacuated collector. The obtained value of global heat loss coefficient (2.2+0.1T^*) represented the effect of evacuation and selective surface of the tested collector. This small coefficient might cause the difficulty of precise direct measurement of heat losses from the collector for some ranges of (T_m-T_a) under no incidence of solar radiation due to the limitation of precision of the thermopile used for the measurement of the fluid temperature difference between collector inlet and outlet. In the direct heat losses measurements under no incidence of solar radiation, heat is transfered from the fluid in tube to the plate, while heat is transfered reversely in the efficiency measurement under the proper incidence of solar radiation. Therefore, the absorber plate temperature is different between both cases even at the same T_m. This difference of plate temperature causes the variation of the heat loss coefficient of the collector especially in present case. The caution should be taken account in application of the testing procedure like BSE, in which the η_0-T^* relation is constructed by directly measured η_0 value and the global heat loss coefficient determined by the direct heat losses measurements.
View full abstract