In this paper, the author will report the result of standardization of tactual perception test for the blind. After the preliminary experiment, as the subtests, the author selected the followings: form perception, length perception, size perception, roughness perception and weight perception. The subjects are 273 totally blind pupils, grade 1 to 6, in the elementary course of schools for the blind. As the control group, 60 normal seeing pupils (blindholded) of the same grade were employed. Results; 1) In the total score of the test, significant difference was found between grade 3 and 4, but no significant difference was found in grade 1 to 3 and in grade 4 to 6. In other word, the progress between grade 3 and 4 was remarkable. As for the subtests, the same result as in the case of total score was seen in the discrimination of form, size and roughness. So to say, in the discrimination of form, size and roughness, the significant progress was found between grade 3 and 4. In the discrimination of length and weight no significant difference was seen in grade 1 to 6. 2) Significant correlations were found between total score and each subtest. The correlations among each subtest were not so high as those of total score with each subtest. 3) As to sex difference, no significant difference was found in the total score, as well as, in all subtests. 4) The correlation coefficients between WISC IQ and total score were 0.23 in lower grade and 0.40 in upper grade. When the subjects were divided into three groups such as the high (25%), the middle (25%) and the low (25%) in the total score, no significant difference was found between the high group and the middle one, but significant difference was seen between the middle group and the low one. As for the relationship of subtests with intelligence, the correlation of intelligence with form discrimination was higher than those of intelligence with discrimination of size, length, roughness and weight. 5) In comparison with the blindholded normal seeing, the blind were superior in total score. As to the subtests, the blind got higher score than the normal in the discrmination of form, length and size, while in the discrimination of roughness and weight no significant difference was found between the blind and the normal.
View full abstract