Previous research suggests that individuals with autistic disorder may fail at tasks that require relational concepts such as comparative and spatial relations. This study examined the assessment and establishment of same/different judgments, considered to be the first step in relational concepts, in two boys with autistic disorder. Component analyses of same/different judgments were carried out by expansion of the Stimulus Equivalence paradigm. Through these analyses, 4 tasks requiring same/different judgments were identified. The boys were trained in 1 of 4 tasks. In the training, they were instructed to match the printed words "same" or "different" to 2 pictures that they had constructed. The target response in "same" trials was maintained by positive reinforcement, whereas the target response in "different" trials was maintained by negative reinforcement. After training with 1 stimulus set, 1 student could generalize the same/different judgments across 5 other stimulus sets and 3 other tasks. The other student could, after training with 3 stimulus sets, generalize the judgments across 3 other stimulus sets and 3 other tasks. These results are discussed in terms of expanding the Stimulus Equivalence paradigm for analyzing and assisting relational concepts.
View full abstract