The experimental works of Zigler and his associates on the behavior of the institutionalized retardate have indicated that his unique social life history, social deprivation, simultaneously produces a reluctance or wariness to interact with adults (negative reaction tendency) and a heightened motivation to do so (positive reaction tendency). This implies that the institutionalized retardate can maintain an affiliative relation with a supportive adult experimenter, when his negative reaction tendency has been preliminarily reduced by some experimental manipulation. In this study, various motivational conditions were set by the experimental manipulations of these reaction tendencies, and the effects of those conditions on the paired associate learning of the institutionalized retarded children and the institutionalized and the noninstitutionalized normal children, matched on MA, were examined. The results were as follows: (1) The motivational effects on the learning behavior of the institutionalized retardate were considerable. The reduction of his negative reaction tendency, which is produced by a preliminary success experience, has a facilitating effect on the successive learning behavior, and the effect is more heightened, when his positive reaction tendency is reduced by the experimenter's social reinforcement in the learning situation. But if his negative reaction tendency has not been preliminarily reduced, the reduction of his positive reaction tendency has no effect on his learning behavior. (2) The motivational effects on the learning behavior of the institutionalized normal were considerable, too, but not completely equal to those on the learning behavior of the institutionalized retardate. The preliminary reduction of his negative reaction tendency had a facilitating effect on his learning behavior, only when his positive reaction tendency was reduced by the experimenter's social reinforcement in the learning situation. In addition, the learning under the motivational condition in which both of these reaction tendencies were reduced was comparable with that under the motivational condition in which both of these reaction tendencies were not reduced. This result, not found in the case of the institutionalized retardate, implies the difference between the institutionalized retardate and normal in the ability to cope with social deprivation. (3) Motivational effects on the learning behavior of the noninstitutionalized normal were hardly found. He used an innerdirected learning strategy under the various motivational conditions. (4) The learning levels of the institutionalized retarded children, the institutionalized and the noninstitutionalized normal children, matched on MA, were significantly different from one another, when motivational conditions were not considered. The analysis of this result was attempted in terms of theories of the behavioral characteristics of retarded children: developmental positions and difference or defect positions.
View full abstract