In the previous study published by this journal (Niimi & Uemura, 1980; Uemura & Niimi, 1981), we reported that we had developed the scale for measuring stresses on the mother of handicapped infant and it had been constructed by five factors named as follows. That is, they were F I: stress caused by human relations of outside of family, F II: stress caused by her infants maladaptive behavior itself, F III: stress caused by anxiety about present and future conditions of development of her handicapped infant, F IV: stress arised from marital relations with her hasband as regards the problems surrounding their handicapped infant, FV: stress caused by obstructedness of selfactualization in her everyday life. The purposes of this report are to classify the stress patterns on the basis of each individual's factor scores calculated from five factors and to find a clue to the psychological intervention for each type through describing the characteristics of this. Data used in this analysis were those of five kinds of handicaps (autism, AUT: Down's syndrome, DOWN; mental retardation except Down's syndrome, MR; multiple handicap, MUL; severe mental and physical handicaps, SMP) among the data reported in previous study, and they were analized by Q-mode cluster analysis for each handicap. As the result, they were clusterized between 8 and 6 groups for each handicap, and we named each of these clusters "type" (Table 1). Next, with respect to these total 34 types, cluster analysis among them was done by using mean factor scores of each type. We obtained 19 clusters finally, and 8 of the 19 contained more than two kinds of types in these clusters (Fig. 1). We named each of these 19 clusters "core type". At the time of describing the characteristics of these core types, we took up the above-mentioned 8 core types common among the kind of handicap and 4 core types showing the stress pattern pecurior to the kind of handicap, and analized background factors of each of them by selecting the representative cases being included in each of these core types. The characteristics of stress pattern of each core type and the kind of handicap constructing one are as follows: 1. High stress factor (H) II, Low stress factor (L) I, IV, V; AUT, MR, MUL. 2. (H) III, (L) V; AUT, DOWN, MR, MUL. 3. (H) III, V (L) II, IV; MUL, SMP. 4. (H) IV, V, (L) I, II; MUL, SMP. 5. (H) I, II, V (L) IV; DOWN, MR. 6. (H) I, III, V (L) IV; DOWN, MUL, SMP. 7. (H) I, II, III, V (L) IV; AUT, MUL. 8. (L) I, II, III, IV, V; AUT, DOWN, MR, MUL, SMP. 9. (H) I, IV; AUT. 10. (H) II, V (L) I; AUT. 11. (H) IV (L) II; MUL. 12. (H) I, III, V (L) II; SMP. Finally, we discussed from three points of view with respect to these results and next step of this study in perspective; (1) on method of extraction of type from each handicap, (2) on method of extraction of core type from total 34 types, (3) on points of the description by using representative cases of each core type.
View full abstract