In the 23 wards of Tokyo, air-conditioners have been set up in all classrooms of public elementary and junior high schools since 2014. In Japan, the proportion of installing air conditioners in public classrooms of public elementary and junior high school is 49.6%, which is rapidly increasing. There is concern that energy consumption of elementary and junior high school will increase even further in the future. However, in Japan, the "Building Energy Efficiency Act" came into effect in 2016, and the thermal performance of the building's envelope and the method of calculating the primary energy consumption were determined. According to the specified method of calculation, two indices, Building Perimeter Index (BPI) and Building Energy Index (BEI) are obtained.
The purpose of this investigation is to comprehend the energy consumption situation of elementary schools in the Tokyo S ward, which is equipped with air conditioning facilities in all classrooms. First, we calculate the thermal performance of the envelope and the primary energy consumption according to the method prescribed in the "Building Energy Efficiency Act" and examine the correlation. Next, we compare the calculation result obtained by this calculation method with the actual measurement value. The following conclusions were obtained.
1) The average primary energy consumption of the primary school in S ward is 498 MJ /m
2 per year. This significantly exceeded the primary energy consumption average of elementary and middle schools, 356 MJ /m
2 per year nationwide and 305 MJ /m
2 per year in the 6th climate zone including Tokyo.
2) The primary energy consumption of the elementary schools in S ward are classified into two categories based on the completion year. For these two model schools, the calculations were conducted based on the "Building Energy Efficiency Act". BPI and BEI for both school A of the new specification and school B of the conventional specification were less than 1.0, and satisfactory results were obtained. The BPI was lower in school A than that in school B, and the difference in thermal performance of the envelope appeared to be remarkable. The BEI of school B was lower than that of school A.
3) In addition, we calculated the energy consumption based on the type of building. The school building shows substantial air- conditioned energy consumption, and the gymnasium building shows significant lighting energy consumption. The consumption equipment ratio of the school building and the gymnasium were exceedingly different.
4) The energy consumption of the air-conditioning equipment accounts for 60% of the total consumption. The air conditioning energy consumption per floor area of school A exceeds that of school B. Converting to the calculation per air-conditioning floor area, the value for school A becomes lower than that of school B.
5) The design values of the primary energy consumption calculated from the "Building Energy Efficiency Act" were 454 MJ /m
2 per year for school A and 341 MJ /m
2 per year for school B. However the measured value of the primary energy consumption of the entire school was 585 MJ /m
2 per year in case of school A and 449 MJ /m
2 per year in case of school B. The design value was estimated to be approximately 3/4 of the measured value of the entire school, and the primary reason behind this difference is the use of kitchen equipment not being included in the calculation earlier
View full abstract