This paper aims to identify the elements needed for alternative dispute resolution mechanisms in the forest sectors of developing countries―as seen from the local community perspective. To do so, the paper examines existing principles, standards, guidelines, previous studies and reports. First, the arguments about the significance of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms are reviewed. Two key elements are identified: regular communication based on the autonomy of both sides in a dispute, and the involvement of a fair third party. Next, the paper surveys how these two elements have been embodied in principles, standards, guidelines, previous studies and reports on dispute resolution mechanisms in the forest sectors of developing countries. For the first one, the paper finds that project implementers should first build a trusting relationship based on dialogue with the local community, and then be involved in design and implementation of dispute resolution mechanisms with the local community. For the second one, a respected local leader or organization should be engaged as a mediator between the project implementer and local community, to maintain community harmony, human relations, and culture―which are more important than seeking independence or neutrality within the local community.
View full abstract