Objective : We evaluated the cytological diagnosis of endometrioid adenocarcinoma (G1) and endometrial hyperplasia compared to conventional cytological criteria.
Study Design : Cases involved 35 of G1, 10 of atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH), 11 of complex hyperplasia (EH-C), and 13 of simple hyperplasia. We investigate the following features :
(1) atypical cell clump frequency—clumps with highly dense glands (CHDE), dendriform clumps (DC), papillary clumps (PC), irregularly branching glands (IBG), and clumps of dilated glands (CDG)
(2) the occurrence of associated features—disordered cell arrangement, squamous metaplasia, background and neutrophilic inclusion, and endometrial stromal cells.
Results : Cytologically, we observed no significant difference between clumps of dilated glands and irregular branching gland in EH-S and EH-C ; numerous CHDE in AEH ; CHDE and DC appeared in EA. Associated features, such as disordered cell arrangement, squamous metaplasia, background, and neutrophilic inclusion, differed significantly.
Conclusion : To cytologically differentially diagnose EA in different EH phases, diversified assessment is needed especially for (1) squamous metaplasia, and (2) background and neutrophil inclusion are emphasized in addition to conventional aspects.
View full abstract