In recent linguistic studies, the internal structure of English infinitives has proved to be highly controversial. One of the most important topics in analyzing them is the categorical status of the infinitival marker
to.
This paper claims that the category VP belongs to a set of universal syntactic categories, such as VP, NP, AP, PP, and S, and that VP is essential for the syntax of English infinitives, although some theories including the GB Theory refute the existence of VP. Various pieces of evidence are adduced to show that VP is a major phrasal category in English syntax.
Furthermore, it is argued that VP is a projection of INF, but not of VP, and that
to is a head of VP. In other words,
to is a lexical item with semantic content, and belongs to the category INF.
Finally, we show that INF can be incorporated into the system of complementizers, and that English complementizers are classified into clausal complementizers (
e. g.: that, for, or WH) and phrasal complementizers (
e. g.: to). This analysis enables us to account for otherwise unexplained syntactic and semantic behavior of the infinitival marker to in English.
View full abstract