Inhalation and intranasal spraying methods were compared in administration of live influenza vaccine to human subjects. Both methods were useful in live influenza vaccination, but with respect to economy and conveniency, inhalation method was better.
Three inhalation methods were compared. Deep breathing, urgent breathing and normal breathing in 10 seconds inhalation made no remarkable differences in rate of antobody response, but normal breathing seemed to be the best.
No remarkable differences were observed between the group inhaled for 10 seconds and for 60 seconds, but severe reactions such as fever were recognized more frequent in the group inhaled for 60 seconds. No irregularity in antibody response was observed by 10 second inhalation method.
Experiments in white mice show that only 3 seconds of inhalation time is enough to provoke regular antibody response and even one second resulted in no marked irregularity in antibody response.
Inhalation time and ability to make antibody response was lineally proportionate in very wide range at least from 3 seconds to 50 minutes.
View full abstract