The authors previously distinguished the early biotype (E) of Chigaya from the common biotype (C) mainly in respect to its early flowering habit. From earlier field surveys, E-type was considered to be more fugitive than C-type in terms of the habitats. The present study aimed to clarify adaptability to the habitat with special reference to the early stage of community formation. Phenology, biomass and its allocation were investigated using experimental communities of each biotype. Ten harvests, 4 replications of 25 cm quadrat with 25 cm depth in each, were obtained from April to December in 1985. The bulk of E-type shoots headed out in early April immediately after sprouting and set seeds. In C-type, on the other hand, a few shoots headed out a month later, but failed in seed setting. This means that E-type of the species has not only an early flowering habit, but also much less time for pre-flowering vegetative growth. Consequently, dry weight of flowering organs in C-type was negligible. E-type showed nearly 3 g of panicles per quadrat with around 80% seed fertility, so the number of fertile seeds was estimated about 200 per panicle (ca. 96,000/m^2). The total biomass in C-type rapidly increased until summer with some spring depression, and reached maximum in late August. In E-type, it increased linearly throughout the growing season, and reached maximum in late November, showing one and a half times as much total biomass compared to that in C-type. The mode of dry matter allocation clearly differed between types, particularly in summer. The above-ground/below-ground ratio (T/R ratio) in C-and E-types showed nearly 1/1 and 1/2, respectively in late August, mainly due to the difference in rhizome weight. Sexual reproductive effort, roughly estimated, was no doubt higher in E-type suggesting a high colonizing-ability. This was considered advantageous in this type in terms of its fugitive behaviour. In connection with the competitive-ability, however, many complicated phenomena remained unsolve, although vegetative reproductive effort in E-type was higher than in C-type.
View full abstract