A renewed concept of rural development has been introduced in several European countries since about 1960. This has been introduced also in Japan since about 1970. Among those industrial countries, West Germany and Japan have similarities: West Germany has the Land Consolidation Act (Flurbere-inigungsgesetz) as basic legislation for local level undertakings, while Japan has the Land Improvement Law.In fact, the legal precedent of the Land Improvement Law was adapted from the German law. Another similarity is the hierarchical structure for regional development and planning in accordance with the administrative structure.
The objective of this paper is to compare and discuss the legislative and other frameworks for rural development in these two countries. The first and most important consideration is the effect of the legislation on reforming rural areas.The second is the structure of development and planning.Ansl the final consideration is the integration or coordination function of the recent rural development.
In West Germany, rural development projects must be initiated by the order of public authorities. Therefore, the governmental control is relatively strong.Non-agricultural objectives are included in the project agenda as well as agricultural objectives. The projects are in many cases well coordinated with other public infrastructural improvement projects.
Japanese land improvement projects, on the other hand, must be based on the voluntary application by farmers. The objective is restricted to agricultural matters only, and the undertakings of such projects are often poorly coordinated with other public undertakings.
The hierarchy and the organization for development and planning is more systematically structured in West Germany effectively integrated with other planning at the local level. The objective of overall development for rural communities is clearer in West Germany than in Japan.
In terms of the effect of rural development on improving and restructuring rural areas, the German system is superior to the Japanese one. However, the restrictive and authoritative nature of the German procedure could be counted as a drawback.
View full abstract