All issues
Volume 7 (1988 - 1989･･･
- Issue 4 Pages 2-
- Issue 3 Pages 2-
- Issue 2 Pages 2-
- Issue 1 Pages 2-
Volume 7, Issue 4
Displaying 1-7 of 7 articles from this issue
- |<
- <
- 1
- >
- >|
-
- Basic Study on District Suitability Classification (4) -Satoshi HOSHINO, Teitaro KITAMURA1989 Volume 7 Issue 4 Pages 2-12
Published: March 30, 1989
Released on J-STAGE: April 13, 2011
JOURNAL FREE ACCESSIn the evaluation process of the District Suitability Classification (DSC), an empirical method or Principal Component Analysis (PCA) method have been applied for identifying an evaluation function. In this paper, the authors propose a new evaluation method by Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), which was recently developed by T. L. Saaty. Characteristics of the AHP method is theoretically compared with those of the former methods, viz; the empirical method and the PCA method. Some application problems are also discussed.
The AHP method is, one side, in common with the empirical method in point that the norm of the evaluation function is given by subjective judgements of intellectuals and researchers. Because a style of subjective judgements of the AHP method is pair-wise comparison among indices, the weight coefficients estimated by the AHP method can be more accute than those by the empirical method. The other side, procedure of the AHP method is objective same as the PCA method. This means reappearance of the coefficients is assured. Because the AHP method has respective advantages of the former methods, it is thought that this method has a great possibility as a new evaluation method for the DSC.
But it is not reasonable to fix the scale values of the AHP method, which translate pair-wise judgements to weight ratios. The scale values should be readjusted by each cases.View full abstractDownload PDF (1752K) -
Yohei SATOH, Hubert N. van LIER1989 Volume 7 Issue 4 Pages 13-28
Published: March 30, 1989
Released on J-STAGE: April 13, 2011
JOURNAL FREE ACCESSThis paper is focused on multiple land use planning in rural areas exemplified with outdoor recreation in the Netherlands.
Planning for outdoor recreation is done within the physical planning system. Plans for outdoor recreation facilities on the provincial level should fit into the national policy of outdoor recreation. Provinces only can plan those facilities that are made possible on the national level. Municipalities or outdoor recreation districts have to make concrete planswhich fit into the higher levels.
Outdoor recreation forms also part of the land consolidation programs and the reclamations. The planning of outdoor recreation facilities is found to be very important. There is a large demand for facilities related to water and beaches as well as day-and stay-recreltion facilities on the land itself.
Public bodies keep a responsibility of planning, creatind and managing of outdoor recreation facilities because of hardness to make profitable. However several outdoor recreation activities are made profitable and therefor managed by private entrepreneurs. At the moment many studies and negotiations are under way to increase the private sector in outdoor recreation.View full abstractDownload PDF (2042K) -
[in Japanese]1989 Volume 7 Issue 4 Pages 29-37
Published: March 30, 1989
Released on J-STAGE: April 13, 2011
JOURNAL FREE ACCESSDownload PDF (2110K) -
[in Japanese]1989 Volume 7 Issue 4 Pages 38-48
Published: March 30, 1989
Released on J-STAGE: April 13, 2011
JOURNAL FREE ACCESSDownload PDF (2002K) -
[in Japanese]1989 Volume 7 Issue 4 Pages 49-55
Published: March 30, 1989
Released on J-STAGE: April 13, 2011
JOURNAL FREE ACCESSDownload PDF (1758K) -
[in Japanese], [in Japanese], [in Japanese], [in Japanese]1989 Volume 7 Issue 4 Pages 56-68
Published: March 30, 1989
Released on J-STAGE: April 13, 2011
JOURNAL FREE ACCESSDownload PDF (2776K) -
[in Japanese]1989 Volume 7 Issue 4 Pages 69-75
Published: March 30, 1989
Released on J-STAGE: April 13, 2011
JOURNAL FREE ACCESSDownload PDF (1146K)
- |<
- <
- 1
- >
- >|