In order to establish a more efficient program combining pit and fissure sealant with school-based fluoride mouthrinsing, we designed a program based on a screening method in which pits and fissures with higher caries sensitivity were selected using 4 indices and sealed. These 4 indices were sticky fissures diagnosed as CO, occlusal index, occlusal plaque index (O.P.I), and school grade. The purposes of this study are the evaluation of the usefulness of the program.
The subjects, 1st to 3rd graders, were 465 children in elementary school Y and 175 children in elementary school W. The children lived in two neighboring villages which are similar in socioeconomic environment. They had participated in a school-based fluoride mouthrinsing program (FMR) since nursery school. The FMR consisted of rinsing daily with 0.05% NaF from 4 years of age at in nursery school and rinsing weekly with 0.2% NaF after entrance to elementary school.
The screening method consisted of two steps. In the first step, sticky fissures in the occlusal surfaces, buccal pits, and lingual grooves of all 4 first permanent molars were diagnosed as CO. In the second step, the CO surfaces were evaluated based on occlusal index, O.P.I., and school grade. The surfaces evaluated as being in poor condition by these indices were distinguished as high risk CO (H-CO) from the other CO surfaces estimated as low risk CO (L-CO).
In school Y light-polymerized opaque sealants were applied to H-CO surfaces and L-CO surfaces were left without any application until the next examination 6 months later. In school W both H-CO and L-CO surfaces were left without any application. The progression of caries from the previous level, i.e., sound, sealant applied, H-CO, or L-CO, was compared every 6 months.
In school Y the percentage of surfaces progressing to above C
1 after 6 months was 0.3% in sound, 12.5% in L-CO, and 0% in sealant-applied surfaces. The percentage of complete retention of sealant was 93.1%. The ratio of relative risk estimated was 50.0 in L-CO surfaces against sound surfaces. In school W the percentages of progressing surfaces were 1.6% in sound, 32.9% in H-CO, 17.6% in L-CO, and 30.1% in the total CO surfaces. The ratio of relative risk estimated was 18.8 in the total CO surfaces against sound surfaces and 1.9 in H-CO against L-CO. It was confirmed that CO surfaces, especialy H-CO surfaces selected by this screening method had more risk of dental caries.
The relative risk of sound surfaces in progressing to dental caries was very low. Accordingly it was reasonable that the sealings were applied only to occlusal surfaces selected by the screening method without sealing all the occlusal surfaces. It was concluded that this program of selecting CO surfaces and applying sealant particularly to H-CO surfaces was appropriate for decreasing the cost of sealant application.
View full abstract