Many cases of contact allergy due to dental metals have been reported, and several in vitro or in vivo tests have been used for the screening of the allergenic epitopes. One of the in vitro methods is the lymphocyte stimulation test, which can reveal the sensitization of T-cells by an enhanced proliferative response of peripheral blood lymphocytes to a certain metals. In this study, to evaluate the lymphocyte stimulation test as a screening method for metal allergy, an intradermal patch test was performed in 410 subjects, of whom 17 subjects with or without experience of metal allergy, also received a lymphocyte stimulation test of mercury, nickel, chromium, cobalt, gold, titanium and DNCB (1-Chloro 2, 4-dinitrobenzene). In the case of DNCB, positive responses to both patch test and the lymphocyte stimulation test were found in only one subject who was occupationally exposed to the chemical and showed allergic symptoms. Cobalt, chromium, gold and titanium caused positive proliferation in patch test-positive subjects with or without allergenic experience, and the stimulation index (SI) values were lower than 180 in patch test-negative subjects. Thus, we suggest that the lymphocyte stimulation test was a reliable in vitro method for identifying chemical sensitivity. However, in the case of mercury and nickel, the SI values between the patch test-positive and negative cases did not differ significantly, and the values of all subjects were higher than 181. So we speculate that the T-cell of all subjects were sensitized to mercury and nickel because those metals are used widely in daily tools. Particularly high SI value was found in the subject who had been occupationally exposed to mercury, but had negative responses in vivo. This finding suggests that a positive response in the lymphocyte stimulation test may also have been caused by immunological tolerance, even if the subjects showed a negative response in vivo. Therefore, for identifing mercury and nickel hypersensitivity, the lymphocyte stimulation test was not a sufficiently accurate method and we recommend using a different functional test.
View full abstract