Teenagers are particularly susceptible to gingivitis, and its prevalence increases with age. We proposed the use of electric toothbrushes for maintaining gingival health in high school students. Thus, we evaluated the relative ability of the oscillating/pulsating electric toothbrush Oral-B[○!R] ProfessionalCare[○!R] 8000 (PC) and side-to-side motion electric toothbrush Sonicare[○!R] elite[○!R] e9800 (SE). Moreover, this study investigated the perceived comfort and safety of and preference for electric toothbrushes of high school students using a questionnaire, designed to evaluate the characteristics of the two powered toothbrushes. Dental examination was performed at a high school in all 1st-3rd grade students (15-18 years old, 956 students). Sixty-five students were diagnosed with gingivitis. All subjects were informed about the aims of the study, and 59 gave signed, informed consent. Among the 59 students who entered the study, 48 completed the protocol. Eleven subjects were excluded from the study because they were wearing fixed orthodontic appliances (3 subjects), using antibiotics (3 subjects), or showed poor brushing compliance (5 subjects). This study followed a matched, parallel, examiner-blind design. Subjects were scored regarding the probing depth, bleeding on probing (BOP), and the Turesky et al. modification of the Quigley & Hein index (PlI) in 10 index teeth (17,16,11,26,27,37,36,31,46,47) at the baseline. The PC and SE groups were matched by school grade, sex, the percentage of BOP, PlI, and probing depth. Subjects were instructed to brush twice daily for 2 min without dentifrice. They were given professional instructions for approximately 5 min on the use of either toothbrush. The probing depth, percentage of BOP, P1I, and gingival abrasion were recorded after 2, 4, and 8 weeks. At the end of the study (after 8 weeks of brushing), all subjects completed a questionnaire. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test for non-parametric, unrelated samples, multiple comparisons test for non-parametric, related samples, and Fisher's exact probability test for subjective symptoms. Overall, there was no significant difference between the two groups in any indices. During the study period, the multiple comparisons test showed a significant improvement in all indices for both powered toothbrushes. There were 4 sites of gingival abrasion in PC and 0 in SE. At 8 weeks, no gingival abrasion was observed in either group. The number of subjects who exhibited bleeding on brushing and oral malodor in both powered toothbrush groups decreased from the baseline to 8 weeks. Some users felt that the head and sound of both electric toothbrushes were too large. In conclusion, PC and SE improved the percentage of BOP, PlI, and probing depth in high school students with gingivitis. The use of both electric toothbrushes can be considered safe untill 8 weeks. PC and SE had almost the same effects on gingivitis in high school students. For prospective electric toothbrushes, a smaller brush head and more pleasant sound while operating would be desirable.
View full abstract