Professional topical fluoride application is an effective caries preventive measure performed by dentists or dental hygienists. However, the decreasing availability of the application trays which have been widely used and transferring of responsibility for the dental health care program for mothers and children to municipalities may affect the professional topical fluoride program at health centers. To clarify the situations and problems concerning the professional topical fluoride programs, a questionnaire was sent to health centers throughout the country. There sults provide an important basis for the future plans regarding the professional topical fluoride program. In the middle of January, 1993, we sent the questionnaire by mail to 946 health centers who were asked to send back the responses within 2 months. We received responses from 77.6% of the health centers that had received the questionnaire, of which 43.7% were conducting the program at the time of the survey. 3.2% had discontinued the program, and 53.0% had never undertaken the program. Of the health centers that were conducting the program. 59.0% were using acidulated phosphate fluoride solutions, 30.7% sodium fluoride solution, and 24.2% acidulated phosphate fluoride gel. For application of fluoride, the complicated paint on technique was most commonly used (78.2%), follwed by the iontophoresis technique (30.5%), the tray technique (7.8%), and the toothbrush technique (4.9%). The health centers that were actively conducting educational campaigns on the program or health instructions on the use of fluoride had been performing larger-scale applications over longer time periods than others. The reasons for discontinuation of the program were loss of dental experts (22.7%), lack of time(18.2%), transfer of the program to the dental association (18.2%), changes to other preventive measures (13.6%), discontinuation of the budget (9.1%), transfer of the program to the municipalities (9.1%), and failure to prove the preventive effect (9.1%). The reasons for not undertaking the program were lack of sufficient equipment, personnel, or time (39.2%), lack of budgets (20.9%), because the municipalities were conducting on the program (21.2%), because the dental association were conducting on the program (8.0%), presence of opposition movements (6.4%), because these health centers placed emphasis on educational programs or health instruction on subjects other than use of fluoride (6.1%), and lack of conviction regarding the preventive effect (5.5%).
View full abstract