The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of job rotation on leadership behavior. Specifically, we examined the effect of similarities between initial and subsequent jobs and changes in subordinate personnel on the leadership behavior of rotated bank managers and supervisors.
We administered a leadership survey (PM leadership survey questionnaire-Misumi, 1970) to employees of two banks at one year intervals for five years and six years, respectively. The number of managers and supervisors was 565 at bank A. and 1, 489 at bank B. An average of six, subordinate evaluations per year rated the Performanceoriented and Maintenance-oriented leadership behavior of each manager or supervisor.
The main results were as follows:
1. The groups of non-rotated managers and supervisors showed considerably higher consistency in both their P behavior and M behavior (P: r=. 53-. 88; M: r=. 53-. 80) than the rotated groups (P-. 28-. 48: M-. 28-. 38).
2. Many changes occurred in the leadership PM pattern among rotated managers and supervisors, including an unexpected shift from the PM pattern to the pm pattern as well as the reverse.
3. Correlations were low both between leadership scores before and one year after job rotation (P. 30; M. 35) and between scores before and two years after job rotation (P. 34; M. 27). On the other hand, the correlations between scores one year and two years after job rotation were significantly higher than the above correlations (P. 71; M. 63). This suggeis that changes in leadership behavior persist for at least two years after job rotation.
4. The rotated groups with similar jobs showed higher consistency in their P behavior than those with dissimilar jobs (. 45>. 27).
5. The groups of rotated managers and supervisors who moved within the branch showed higher consistency in their M behavior than those moved to another branch (. 57>. 24).
6. Positive correlations were found between changes in P scores and changes in M scores (. 37-. 79).
View full abstract