Prevention of human errors like missing-information or jumping-to-conclusion is one of key success factors in the design of the operation manuals or operation/function descriptions used in an emergency. Therefore, it is necessary to identify the parts in which these errors are apt to occur beforehand based on the assessment of the drafted sentences. In this paper, an experiment on panels using samples of short sentences was carried out, with the applicability and merits/demerits of the following two methods of evaluating the possibility of the occurrence of missinginformation and jumping-to-conclusion being examined :
(a) The evaluation method using physical characteristics calculated from sentences,
(b) The evaluation method using images that readers receive from sentences.
As the result, it was concluded that the method using average and SN ratio of the images received from sentences is more accurate in the case of evaluating various types of sentences, and the effects of the time limit in an emergency can also be predicted using the average and SN ratio of the images.
View full abstract