For the purpose of long-term preservation of small-pox vaccine, Hornibrook et al. (1951) first published a report on preparation of freeze-dried vaccine, stating that an addition of lactose-salt mixture could protect the dried small-pox vaccine from its deterioration during the storage. Afterwards, Cockburn et al. (1957) studied on the protecting effect of peptone as an adjuvant, and recommended the use of peptone-dried small-pox vaccine in epidemic areas of the tropic. Meanwhile, Yanagisawa et al. (1963) have reported that an addition of sodium glutamate instead of peptone to the vaccine was found to better preserve vaccine potency during storages at 37 C and 45 C. Further study on the utility of sodium glutamate has been conducted by Suzuki et al. (1964) . They showed that the dried vaccine could preserve its potency at least for three years and that it was more stable than that of the ordinary glycerinated vaccine lymph.
Further studies on the properties of freeze-dried vaccine have been made by the authors to draft the Minimum Requirements of two dried vaccines (1965), using peptone or glutamate as the adjuvant. This paper presents results of comparative studies on heat stability and long-term preservability of both dried vaccines, considering residual moisture content in each ampoule and the reason why the new Minimum Requirements were recently issued. The expiration date of the dried vaccine is three years after approved by the national assay, and the heat stability test is adopted, instead of preservability that needed for 6 months, as a simple and rapid way.
View full abstract