It is well known that incision and drainage is the most popular method of treating anorectal abscesses. However, no consensus has been reached on the appropriate method of anesthesia, use of drain, type of drain, and duration of its placement.
In this study between November 2003 and April 2008, 131 patients were diagnosed with a perianal abscess and underwent initial incision and drainage at our hospital. We retrospectively examined all 131 patients and evaluated the effect of using a drain. We investigated the following factors that we believe might affect recurrence: method of anesthesia, use of drain, type of drain, and duration of its placement. Recurrence was defined as the recurrence of an abscess or the formation of an anal fistula.
Out of a total of 131 patients, 45 experienced recurrence, and 86 were cured without recurrence. A significant difference was observed only in the type of drain, meaning a hard drain is more effective than a soft drain in terms of recurrence. However, the type of anesthesia, and the use of a drain had no statistically significant effect on recurrence.
In conclusion, we would like to recommend a hard drain rather than a soft drain when a drain is required.
View full abstract