Japanese Journal of Southeast Asian Studies
Online ISSN : 2424-1377
Print ISSN : 0563-8682
ISSN-L : 0563-8682
Volume 18, Issue 1
Displaying 1-12 of 12 articles from this issue
Article
  • Susumu Yamakage
    Article type: Article
    1980Volume 18Issue 1 Pages 3-21
    Published: 1980
    Released on J-STAGE: June 02, 2018
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
     Regional cooperation in Southeast Asia dates back to as early as the late 1950's, a few years after the independence of Malaya. The first experience was negotiations among Malaya, the Philippines and Thailand to create an organization for regional cooperation, which were followed by the formation of ASA (the Association of Southeast Asia) in 1961. This paper analyzes the logic of its formation as a process of consensus-building.
      Due to the lack of interest in ASA, there is little literature on its formation. Therefore, the first half of the paper presents a chronological survey of the formation process since 1958. Three sections deal with the foreign policy and general attitudes toward regional cooperation of the three ASA countries. Four sections cover the development of a joint endeavor to create an organization. One section discusses the responses of other Southeast Asian countries, among which that of South Vietnam is of particular interest.
      The second half presents an analysis of the logic of the formation of ASA. The first three sections are the preliminary development of a typology of the proposals made in the course of negotiations leading to the formation of ASA. Proposals are typologized in terms of the following three fundamental standpoints : (1) the objective or the range of cooperation; (2) the domain of memberstates; and (3) legal and institutional foundation. Based on the typology, the logic of consensus-building is analyzed through application of "the principle of minimal commitments" in the fourth section. This principle, originally hypothesized in this paper, argues that each item of the consensus corresponds to the weakest commitment by negotiators. Although it appears contrary to common sense, it seems to work in Southeast Asia. The final two sections deal with other important issues in the formation process of ASA in relation to the applicability of the abovementioned principle.
    Download PDF (1893K)
  • Official Visits, 1975-78
    Kyoko Tanaka
    Article type: Article
    1980Volume 18Issue 1 Pages 22-39
    Published: 1980
    Released on J-STAGE: June 02, 2018
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
     Since 1971, the United States' disengagement from Vietnam and its rapprochement with China have brought about dramatic changes in international relations in Asia. Among them was the ASEAN nations' normalization of their relations with China. Singapore, a small city-state with a predominantly Chinese population, needed close ties with its ASEAN neighbours for survival and played down its "Chineseness." In 1975, while reiterating that it would be the last in ASEAN to establish diplomatic ties with China, Singapore sent its Foreign Minister, S. Rajaratnam, to Beijing to improve bilateral relations. By the next year, however, when its Prime Minister Lee Kwan Yew visited China, Indochina had been communized and ASEAN had closed ranks to withstand the communist threat. This prompted Lee to emphasize Singapore's ASEAN identity rather than to foster closer ties with China.
      After Lee's visit, conflicts among the communist countries over Indochina drove Singapore further into ASEAN identity and dissociation from China. In late 1978, when Deng Xiaoping, China's Deputy Prime Minister, visited Singapore, it pronounced emphatically that its future was with the ASEAN nations and denied all special links with China. Singapore's escalating emphasis on ASEAN identity and the "de-Sinicization" dictated chiefly by international factors illustrate a small nation's strategy for survival.
    Download PDF (1797K)
  • Kazutaka Nakano
    Article type: Article
    1980Volume 18Issue 1 Pages 40-67
    Published: 1980
    Released on J-STAGE: June 02, 2018
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
     Some aspects of the subsistence economy of a Skaw Karen tribal village, based mainly on rice production in swiddens and in wet fields in a hilly region of Northern Thailand, were quantitatively investigated. The labor productivity at swiddens in terms of energy, that is, the ratio between the combustion energy of husked rice from swiddens and net energy expenditure of a worker, was calculated to be not more than 14.5 which was estimated to be far less than that at wet paddy fields without the input of compost and chemical fertilizer. In normal years, approximately 45 percent of the total annual rice production in this village is surplus, above the base subsistence level (domestic consumption plus reserve for seeds). Roughly 40 percent of this surplus is consumed by the herd of pigs in the village. The amount for sale is not very great in terms of the percentage to the total rice production of the village. A consideration using a simple model elucidated that the rice production at swiddens alone can hardly provide the surplus above the base subsistence level. The huge surplus which this village produces results chiefly from the rice production in wet fields. For a swiddener, cultivation of a wet field hardly reduces the production at his swidden, but adds to the yield of his swidden. Furthermore, the management of wet paddy fields improves the average labor productivity of a swiddener. For religious reasons, the villagers are obliged to keep a large herd of pigs. Their desire to multiply the number of pigs is very great and not yet satisfied. The herd seems to fill the role of shock absorber against a bad harvest. Although the calory and protein intake of the inhabitants derives mostly from rice, the nutritional state there is not considered to be very poor.
    Download PDF (2624K)
Notes
Review Article
Field Report etc.
feedback
Top