The aim of this study was to objectively compare the detection rate of individual scanning techniques for lesions in the body and the tail of the pancreas and to highlight the characteristics of each technique. We compared detection characteristics of scanning techniques by focusing attention on the detection rate and the detection site of 35 cystic lesions of pancreas in 26 patients. Three combinations of position changes and examination procedures studied were (A) transversal scanning of the epigastric region in the sitting position, (B) scanning of the left intercostal area in the sitting position, and (C) transversal scanning of the intercostal area in the right decubitus position.
The detection rate of each scanning technique for all lesions was (A) 74%. (B) 14%, and (C) 77%. The distribution of the detected lesions was (A) 47.0±25.7 mm, (B) 97.4±23.8 mm, and (C) 60.3±26.2 mm. No significant difference was observed in the size of the lesions detected by each scanning technique*. Moreover, the distribution of lesions detected by each scanning technique alone was (A) 16.8±8.8 mm, (B) 112.5±38.9 mm, and (C) 91.6±16.1 mm. No significant difference was observed in the size of the lesions detected by each scanning technique alone
*. (
* ; Kruskal-Wallis test p>0.05)
The reason why the detection area was different depends on the scanning technique used, which might be attributable to changes in the detection depth of the pancreas and to the effect of movement of gas in the stomach. (A) was superior in the case of lesions in the head side portion of the pancreatic body, (C) was superior in the case of lesions in the center portion of the pancreatic body to the tail portion, and (B) was superior in the case of the tail portion, respectively, to other methods in terms of the detection rate. We were able to verify that (C) and (B) , were particularly vital to detecting lesions in the tail of the pancreas, a region that has traditionally been difficult to detect.
抄録全体を表示