Objective. Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) reportedly enables surgeons to perform pulmonary resection in case of lung cancer associated with emphysema and low pulmonary function, which do not comply with the conventional criteria for functional pulmonary resection. This study was performed to predict cases in which LVRS effects are attainable.
Method. To assess predicted and measured residual pulmonary function after resection for lung cancer, the percentage of predicted residual pulmonary function and the percentage of measured residual pulmonary function (FVC and FEV
1.0) were compared by Student's paired
t-test between the group of patients with pathologically normal lung tissue (61 patients) and the group of patients with concomitant emphysema (43 patients).
Results. In the patients with normal lung tissue, the percentage of measured residual pulmonary function was not significantly different from the percentage of predicted residual pulmonary function (FVC and FEV
1.0). On the other hand, in the group of patients with emphysema, the percentage of measured residual pulmonary function was higher than the percentage of predicted residual pulmonary function (FEV
1.0, p = 0.0072). In the group of patients with emphysema, the percentage of measured residual pulmonary function was higher than the percentage of predicated residual pulmonary function (FVC and FEV
1.0) in 23 patients with matching resection site and area of low blood flow in the blood flow scintigram (FVC: p = 0.0042, FEV
1.0: p = 0.00014).
Conclusion. Measured postoperative residual FEV
1.0 tends to be higher than predicted in patients with emphysema and it is assumed that LVRS effects are attained particularly in patients with lower blood flow at the resection site.
View full abstract