Results of surgical treatment for 31 cases of anaplastic carcinoma of the lung were surveyed and indication for pulmonary resection on the small cell anaplastic carcinoma was discussed, comparing with that of the large cell anaplastic carcinoma, particularly from clinicopathological point of view.
In the small cell carcinoma, none of the cases had survival more than 2 years and 1 month affer the surgery and prolongation of survival time was not obtained, even when the operation was completely curative, if tumors held any one of the following factors; size of more than 3cm. in diameter, microscopically demonstrable nodal metastasis, occupation of central pulmonary region proximal to segmental bronchi and involvement of tissue or organ adjacent to the lung. Furthermore, eradication of cancer by pneumonectomy had no advantage over lobectomy for an improvement of the result.
In case of the large cell carcinoma, on the other hand, long term survivors more than 5 years did exist even among those who had the tumor larger than 3cm. in size and/or with intrapulmonary nodal metastasis, if they were less than 5cm. in size, and located in the peripheral site of the lung. Additionally, when tumors showed.an invasion to organs adjacent to the lung, a conbined resection was successful, in a few cases, to extend their survival time, in contrast to the case of the small cell carcinoma.
The results described above showed a difference in biological predeterminism of malignancy between two types of carcinoma and suggested that a critical analysis must -be made before a choice of surgical means for treatment of the small cell anaplastic carcinoma of the lung.
View full abstract