This study attempts to clarify how to use the questionnaire-method in the investigation of inferiority feelings.
We assumed that the inferiority feelings relating dynamically with superiority feelings develop on the following 4-stages:
(1) objective basis-factors which may cause the subjective basis.
(2) subjective basis-self-evaluation which may correlate with (1) and is supposed to cause the superiority-inferiority feelings.
(3) superiority-inferiority feelings (consciousness) which depend on (2).
(4) compensatory feelings (consciousness) for (3). We designed the three kinds of questionnaire using the rating scale method, each of which corresponds to (2),(3) and (4) stage respectively, and the recording blank for gathering of the objective data which correspond to (1).
In this study, 20 factors corresponding, to (1) are selected as the items in each questionnaire, and they may be classified into 3 groups (7 of them are physical, 4 intellectual and 9 social). 20 factors in (1) are then represented in different expressions in each of questionnaire corresponding to (2),(3) and (4) respectively. The Ss are 19 boys and 17 girls in the 2nd grade of a junior high school.
Consequently, the aim of this paper is to consider what relations take place between each two of the 4-stages.
Result:
1. The relations between (1) and (2)
(a) The number of the items which were related in (1) and (2) in the direction to “inferiority” was 6% of the whole items.
(b) The number of the items which were rated in (1) in the direction to “inferiority” but in (2) in the direction to “superiority” was 4% of the whole items.
(c) The number of the item which were rated in (1) in the direction to “superiority”, but in (2) in the direction to “inferiority” was 2% of the whole items.
2. The relations between (2) and (3)
(a) The number of the items which were rated in (2) in the direction to “inferiority” and in (3) in the direction to “inferiority feeling” was 9% of the whole items.
(b) The number of the items which were rated in (2) in the direction to “inferioriy” and in (3) in the direction to “feel nothing for” was 5% of the whole items.
(c) The number of the items which were rated in (2) in the direction to “inferiority”, but in (3) in the direction to “superiority feeling” was 1% of the whole items.
3. The relations between (3) and (4)
(a) The number of the items which were rated in (3) in the direction to “inferiority feeling” and in (4) in the direction to “wish to be more superior” was 14% of the whole items.
(b) The number of the items which were rated in (3) in the direction to “inferiority feeling” and in (4) in the direction to “accept to be as it is” was 5% of the whole items.
As stated above, it was revealed that a variety of relations take place between the each two of 4-stages.
Thus, the results will indicate that in the use of questionnaire-method in research of inferiority feelings, the questionnaires corresponding to each stage of (2),(3) and (4) must be designed. The writer considers it necessary one to take the above stated 4-stages whenever one deals with the dynamic problems of inferiority feelings.
抄録全体を表示