The Keio Journal of Medicine
Online ISSN : 1880-1293
Print ISSN : 0022-9717
ISSN-L : 0022-9717
62 巻, 2 号
選択された号の論文の3件中1~3を表示しています
REVIEW
  • Jean-Francois Rey
    2013 年 62 巻 2 号 p. 41-46
    発行日: 2013年
    公開日: 2013/06/25
    [早期公開] 公開日: 2013/05/27
    ジャーナル フリー
    Small-bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) was introduced 11 years ago by Given Imaging and is becoming the gold standard for small-bowel examination. This major step in the field of digestive medicine has opened the possibility of promising non-invasive explorations of the esophagus, stomach, and colon. SBCE can be used to overcome the inherent limitations of enteroscopy, especially in the West, where the capsule has been available since 2001. Obscure gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding with normal findings on upper and lower endoscopy remains the most important indication, and suspected Crohn’s disease is also a well-accepted indication. Findings from a capsule investigation may warrant therapeutic endoscopy, but in many cases, SBCE avoids this useful but time-consuming endoscopic procedure. The use of a colon capsule for colorectal cancer screening when traditional colonoscopy is contraindicated or impossible is undergoing clinical trials. Early results seem promising, but control of colonic motility is still cumbersome, and patient preparation remains the most important drawback. We performed the first clinical trial in humans of a magnetically guided gastric capsule that offers the possibility of investigation with a capsule that can be controlled spatially. To date, we have carried out procedures in more than 400 patients and volunteers, with impressive results compared with high-definition gastroscopy. Even though endoscopy remains the most important tool in the GI field, capsules offer promising new possibilities.
  • Chang Hyun Oh, Seung Hwan Yoon
    2013 年 62 巻 2 号 p. 47-52
    発行日: 2013年
    公開日: 2013/06/25
    ジャーナル フリー
    Cervical arthroplasty was developed in an attempt to maintain cervical motion and potentially to avoid or minimize adjacent-segment degeneration. If cervical arthroplasty is successful, the long-term results of surgery for cervical disc disease should improve. However, problems associated with cervical arthroplasty have been reported: these include kyphosis, heterotopic ossification-induced motion limitation, no motion preservation even at the index level, and a higher revision rate in a limited number of cases compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). In addition, for degenerative cervical disc disorders, the risk of developing adjacent segment degeneration more than 2 years after surgery is reportedly similar for ACDF and cervical arthroplasty. Cervical disc arthroplasty is an emerging motion-sparing technology and is currently undergoing evaluation in many countries as an alternative to arthrodesis for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. The decision whether to use arthrodesis or arthroplasty is a difficult one. The achievement of good prosthetic performance demands exacting implantation techniques to ensure correct placement. This fact underlines the increasing importance of special instrumentation and surgical skills that involve an understanding of prosthetic lubrication, wear, and biologic effects and familiarity with currently available information regarding kinematics, basic science, testing, and early clinical results. Fortunately, a number of devices are at the late preclinical study stage or at the early clinical trial stage, and results in many cases are promising. In the near future, it is likely that new designs will be produced to replace spinal discs totally or partially in a pathologic entity-specific manner.
CASE REPORT
feedback
Top