This study was made, as a part of research for twin at the Tokyo University since 1950, upon twins in Tokyo.
The author printed toe patterns upon adequate paper, by sticking it to each toe and rolling them both, toe and paper. As to nomenclatures, reference to his previous report is hoped.
The results obtained are as follows:
(1) The author represents combinations of the patterns of each foot (r, 1) of each twin (A, B), such as Ar-Br, Al-B1, Ar-B1 and Br-B1. From Table 2, it may be concluded that DT shows rather more significant difference than MT. And MT shows a stronger likeness in respective side of foot of a pair than in feet of a same person, and vise versa in DT. The characteristics of toe III and IV are noteworthy in respect to MT.
(2) MT males reveal the significant difference of the likeness in metatalsal patterns between 1 and B or A and between r and A, though not so remarkable with females. Sexual differences between each combination of T) T) are not significant in MT.
(3) Metatarsal triadii: In MT males, the likeness of M1 between Ar and Br is much stronger than in other combinations, that of M2 between A1 and B1 than in others.
(4) Fibural sinus: Every combination equally resembles.
(5) The author obtained the transitory series of bailer patterns and toe patterns arranged as in Table 9. Setting the distance between neighbouring patterns as value one, those separated from each other are valued according to the smallest number of gasps between the two patterns concerned, but if patterns concerned are same, the value for the distance is zero. As regards to metatarsal triradii, fibural and calcaneal sinus, he gives value one when each of them is present in one and is absent in another, excepting those cases when both feet have the neighbouring metatarsal triradii, when it is valued at zero. In this way, points of a twin pair are obtained by the summation of points of both sides of A and B. Statistically speaking, the mean and the variance are smaller in MT than in DT. The approximation shows the significant difference between MT (_??__??_, _??__??_) and DT (_??__??_, _??__??_) at a 5% level of significance. There is no significant difference between DT (_??__??_, _??__??_) and DT (_??_, _??_).
View full abstract