Whether carrying a load on the back is better than carrying a hand-held load was studied from the viewpoint of their physical effects and the work efficiency of the carrier. A rucksack or the like was used in the former case.
A test for this study was performed using five persons as subjects. They each carried one of five evenly-weighted loads using both methods, walking both forward and backward on a 175-m long course consisting of a slope and a flat surface. The expended time, number of steps, and change in heart rate were examined, and an analytical examination was conducted on the subjects' postures through video-recorded images. Also, the subjects' fatigue level was checked after the test.
When carrying a hand-held load, the heart rate increased more than when carrying a load on the back in the first half of the walking course, and in the latter half, the number of steps and expended time increased, suggesting that the former carrying method is a heavier burden on the carrier. The posture analysis showed a correlation between the physiological results and the subjects' fatigue.
Also, a rucksack was compared to a bag containing necessities for emergency with regard to their physical effects on the carrier. In the latter case, pulse frequency increased and walking speed slowed down more than they did in the former case.
View full abstract