ソシオロジ
Online ISSN : 2188-9406
Print ISSN : 0584-1380
ISSN-L : 0584-1380
41 巻, 3 号
通巻 128号
選択された号の論文の9件中1~9を表示しています
論文
  • ラスレット仮説の批判的検討
    大岡 頼光
    1997 年 41 巻 3 号 p. 3-18,108
    発行日: 1997/02/28
    公開日: 2016/12/22
    ジャーナル フリー
     According to the knowledge of historical demography, Laslett has claimed that the more dispersed the nuclear family was and the more married people leaving the parental, the less kinship support an individual would receive. In that case the more important role collectivity support played and it would be an origin of welfare state. This is true not only of England but also of Scandinavia, he said.
     This paper will clarify that it is not true of Sweden.
     First, I amend Laslett's assertion that Sweden had no kinship support. Sweden had a retirement contract system until the 1910s. By this contract, the younger supported the elderly in return for an inheritance. Many contracts were also made between unrelated persons. They were supports between different families living in the same household. According to Laslett's definition of kinship as a blood relationship, it can be said that there was no kinship support. But it hinders us from evaluating the support in the same household. I revise his hypothesis by changing "kinship support" to "family-community support" grounded on "Hausgemeinschaft" of Mitterauer.
     Second, I examine Laslett's understanding that Sweden had a nuclear family system. I clear that Sweden had more complex family than England until the 19th century.
     Third, I clarify that Laslett cannot explain Sweden in relation with England. England had more nuclear family, more married people having left the parental and not supporting the elderly, and consequently less family-community support than Sweden. But it is not England but Sweden that has more developed welfare state. Laslett's hypothesis contradicts the case, precisely because his definition of collectivity is too vast and he never thinks about people's image about family-community. My hypothesis is that because Sweden had kept family-community support later than England, paradoxically Swedish government could claim "folkhemmet".
  • デュルケーム宗教社会学の動学化のために
    野中 亮
    1997 年 41 巻 3 号 p. 19-35,107
    発行日: 1997/02/28
    公開日: 2016/12/22
    ジャーナル フリー
     This article reconsiders Emile Durkheim's sociology of religion in The Elementary Forms of The Religious Life (1912) for the purpous of theoretical study of social change. Often criticized as 'being static', his work nevertheless contains 'dynamic' elements, which leads us to find a keystone for a social change theory.
     In The Elementary Forms, Durkheim finds the origin of religious and social life through the study of the ethnographic material on the Australian Aborigines. It is in the state of 'collective effervescence', that new ideas emerge and the members feel morally strengthened. This process could be called the creative/re-creative function, and this creative function could be related to 'dynamic' social change.
     Although Durkheim's sociology of religion has 'dynamic' elements, from a theoretical point of view, there are obstacles for the study of social change. The most serious one is that 'the sacred' has theoretical priority over 'the profane'. The religious beliefs and practices among the Aborigines are classified in terms of this dichotomy which Durkheim attempted to explain by linking the sacred to 'society' and the profane to 'individual' life. His description of Aboriginal social life centered on their beliefs and practices that concerned 'the sacred', because of his main forcus, 'social solidarity'.
     But for the study of social change, his unbalanced dichotomy must be reformed by emphasising 'the profane' in each phases - beliefs, practices and so on - of religious life. Through this rectification of Durkheim's unbalanced dichotomy, we can thus reconstruct theoretical position of 'the sacred' and 'the profane', and explain how the 'collective effervescence' occurs.
  • ソウル市の「全州李氏大同宗約院」を事例にして
    魯 富子
    1997 年 41 巻 3 号 p. 37-54,106
    発行日: 1997/02/28
    公開日: 2016/12/22
    ジャーナル フリー
     This article is to clarify the total system of Dongsong organization, which changes with urbanization, based on differences found in large-scale organization in 4 different districts in Seoul city.
     This study has found that there are 4 different types of Dongson organization:
     1 ) A single large group in central business district.
     2 ) Small groups sharing hobbies and jobs in upper-class district.
     3 ) Residential area-based small groups in lower-class district.
     4 ) Both type 2 and type 3 in suburban district.
     Development of such patterns in different districts has showed that urbanization has resulted in segregation of a Dongsong organization into smaller groups with different characteristics depending on district. While residents in upper-class district have formed small groups according to their hobbies and jobs, those who live in lower-class district have established residential area-based small groups.
     Based on findings, this study concludes that, in Korean society urbanization has led to segregation of residential districts according to classes, which has been followed by diversification of small groups in a Dongsong organization.
  • 開発国家の社会的基礎をめぐって
    山田 信行
    1997 年 41 巻 3 号 p. 55-74,105
    発行日: 1997/02/28
    公開日: 2016/12/22
    ジャーナル フリー
     This paper attempts to rethink the "relative autonomy" of the state in capitalist society and criticize "state-centered approach" theoretically.
     First of all the debate on this concept in neo-Marxism in 1970' s is reviewed and the fact that this concept has a very delicate implication of the autonomy is confirmed.
     Secondly three phases, in which the autonomy of the state emerges, is theoretically formalized and this frame of reference is applied to the analysis of three typical developmental states which are those in Japan, Korea and Taiwan.
     Thirdly it is assured that the specificity of developmental states can be grasped by that frame. But this does not signify that the developmental state has the "relative autonomy" and it is suggested that it should be not normal capitalist states, which are formed by contingent factors.
DOING SOCIOLOGY
視点
書評
feedback
Top