Objective: At present, food nutrition labeling is performed in accordance with the Health Promotion Act, but the labeled values are self-certified by manufacturers or distributors. For this reason, compliance tests have been performed to assure the accuracy of the values. As labeled values are tested in multiple laboratories, this study aimed to establish a proficiency-testing methodology to ensure the reliability of analytical values.
Methods: A food sample homogeneous in nutritional components was prepared and distributed to the laboratories registered under the Health Promotion Act. Each laboratory, which is familiar with nutritional analysis, measured the amount of calories, protein, fat, carbohydrate, and sodium (general nutrition labeling requirements) and produced analytical values. The results were collected and analyzed to clarify the proficiency of the laboratories.
Results: Analytical values for the above 5 components obtained by the registered laboratories were these: I) statistical outliers (as determined by using the Grubbs’ test) were not included; II) the difference from the average value was within an empirically acceptable range (
z-score of −3 to 3); and III) the difference from the average value was within ±20%, which was the tolerance limit allowed by the Nutrition Labeling Standards. These data indicate that the analytical values obtained in all of the laboratories were deemed to be adequate.
Conclusion: Proficiency testing, which employs I) to III) above as criteria, is a useful way to ensure the reliability of analytical values obtained by laboratories for nutritional analysis.
View full abstract