Objective: Nutrition labeling values of foods have been self-certified by the industry, and therefore compliance tests, i.e. chemical analysis by third-party laboratories, are performed to assure the accuracy of the labeled values. The Food Labeling Act has commissioned several third-party laboratories for conducting the compliance tests, and it is important to maintain analytical quality among these laboratories. Therefore, a proficiency test was conducted to investigate the situation of registered laboratories under the Food Sanitation Act, which could be entrusted with the compliance test, and case study analyses of the poor results were also conducted to clarify the causes.
Methods: A homogeneous food sample in nutrients was distributed to the 54 registered laboratories without any information except for ingredients. The amount of energy and major nutrients namely calories, protein, fat, carbohydrate, and sodium were tested. Reported results were evaluated using 3 criteria, i.e., the results are not statistical outliers, bias is within statistically acceptable range, and bias is within tolerance limit of declared values.
Results: The results reported by 49 laboratories (91%) were considered adequate. Meanwhile, the results reported by 5 laboratories (9%) contained disputable items, and the breakdown was as follows: 3 laboratories for calories, 0 laboratory for protein, 2 laboratories for fat, 1 laboratory for carbohydrate, and 2 laboratories for sodium (some of them were overlapped). Extreme analytical conditions seemed to be one of the factors for the poor results.
Conclusion: In the present study, a large number of laboratories were found to perform adequate analyses of the amount of major nutrients. Sharing of information, such as how to set up analytical conditions, can help improve technical levels.
View full abstract