Some investigators made an attempt to clarify the etiology of endometritis from the distribution of bacteria in the uterus. They examined organisms distributed in the affected uterus and the healthy one. Organisms of Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Escherichia coli, Corynebacterium, and pyocyaneus were detected from both uteri. As a result, it has been made clear that the healthy uterus is not always so sterile as has been presumed to be. Various kinds of organisms, though different in number, are present in the normal uterus, without exercising any influence on the host animal. This fact was already reported by previous studies. Therefore, it is affirmed that no occurrence of endometritis is dependent solely on the cause of bacteria. BLACK et al. and MURPHREE et al. were successful in causing typical Pyometra in rabbits by introducing a fertilized egg or semen into the uterus at the pseudopregnant period. McDONALD caused experimental pyometra in a rabbit at the pseudopregnant period by injecting semen contaminated with bacteria. Essentially the same results as these were obtained by BLACK et al., WATANABE, and YAMANOUCHI et al. Similar experiments were also conducted by HAWK et al., WINTER et al., and BROOME et al. On the other hand, AZIZ-UD-DIN, TERPSTRA, YAMANOUCHI et al., and BAIER et al. tried to produce endometritis by using such organisms as distributed in the vagina, cervical canal, and uterus. All of them, but the first named, however, found it difficult to give rise typical endometritis by the method. Such being the case, experimental endometritis is hard to develop by simple injection of bacteria in the uterus. MCDONALD et al., BLACK et al., WATANAE, YAMANOUCHI et al., and HAWK et al. represent the consensus of the reason for difficulty of causing this disease experimentally. According to them, the uterus exhibits a quite different response to invading organisms in the follicular phase from that in the corpus-luteum phase in the cow and rabbit. It is very difficult to infect the uterus with bacteria in the follicular phase, but endometritis is easily produced in the uterus at the corpus-luteum phase by introducing bacteria in the organ. They obtained these findings from their experiments and concluded that sex hormones were related strongly to these responses of the uterus. The results of Experiments Nos. 1 and 2 of the present study indicate that the bacteria injected in the uterus at the corpus-luteum phase propagated remarkably to cause endometritis eventually. Such results can be expected from the relationship with sex hormone, as pointed out by MCDONALD et al., BLACK et al., WATANABE, and YAMANOUCHI et al. Since a large amount of bacteria was injected in the two experiments, it must be considered that the uterus might have suffered from any mechanical disturbance by the injection. Accordingly, a small amount of bacteria was used for injection in Experiment No. 3. When injected 4 days or more after copulative stimulation had been given in this experiment, bacteria revealed a conspicuous propagation in the uterus. When injected within 3 days after stimulation, bacteria showed a decrease in number in every case. It is assumed from the relationship with hormone that bacteria will propagate in the uterus when they are injected to the organ at the corpus-luteum phase. This phase can be brought about by ovulation which occurs after copulative stimulation is given. On the other hand, it has been generally understood that the function of corpus-luteum hormone is indistinct immediately after ovulation and becomes gradually remarkable with the lapse of time. In Experiment NO. 3 of the present study, bacteria showed a decrease in number in the uterus when injected there within 3 days after copulative stimmulation had been given. If any relationship with hormone works there, the bacteria will propagate after a temporal decrease in number. Contrary to this presumption, the results indicated no propagation after the decrease i
View full abstract