In recent years there is an increasing tendency towards the use of more potent topical corticosteroids for the treatment of various dermatological disorders. These corticosteroids are useful to repair skin lesions, however, they sometimes produce adverse cutaneous reactions, such as redness, telangiectasia, skin atrophy, etc. These topical side effects occur more readily in infants and in the aged, and in women rather than in men. Also, intertriginous as well as face and neck areas are more susceptible areas. Although it has been reported that erythema, telangiectasia, or skin atrophy are induced more readily by potent topical corticosteroids, more basic comparative studies are required as the frequency of use of each topical corticosteroid should be considered when treating patients with these side effects. This study was performed to compare the potency of several topical corticosteroids in producing erythema, telangiectasia or skin atrophy. The local side effects caused by topical 0.05% clobetasone 17-butyrate were studied in 17 adult male volunteers in a double blind study, in the following combinations. 0.05% clobetasone 17-butyrate ointment (CB) vs. 0.1% hydrocortisone 17-butyrate ointment (HB), for eleven subjects. 0.05% clobetasone 17-butyrate ointment (CB) vs. 0.12% betamethasone 17-varelate ointment (BV), for three subjects. 0.05% clobetasone 17-butyrate ointment (CB) vs 0.025% fluocinolone acetonide ointment (FC), for three subjects. The drugs were applied once a day on the fixed bilateral flexor areas of the forearms, at about 9:00 a. m. A reapplication was made at about 9:00 p. m. of the same day, then the area was occlusively dressed, and removed the following morning. This drug treatment was repeated on a daily basis for seven weeks. Double skin folds were measured with a micrometer three, four, five, six, and seven weeks after the initiation of drug application, and one and two weeks after cessation of application. Also, erythema and telangiectasia were assessed by macroscopic examination and atrophy of the skin was assessed by palpation. The results of these examinations were compared.
1. The micrometer examination on the atrophy of the skin showed that the atrophy of the skin with CB was significantly less than that seen with HB. Also, CB seemed to be less prone to cause atrophy of the skin than did either FA or BV.
2. It was confirmed that CB was significantly less prone to cause erythema, telangiectasia, and atrophy of the skin. Also CB was less prone to cause topical side effects, as compared to FA and BV.
3. Overall assessment confirmed that CB was significantly safer than HB, in terms of these local side effects.
View full abstract