Foods sealed tightly in cans and various packaging materials, are on the markets and the supervision of these foods is being regarded as serious from the public. Especially, the quality of foods as the source of proteins is important from a view-point of food hygiene. For this reason, it is very desirable to find a method that the quality of meats of aquatic animals is determined quickly and exactly. The staple part of meats of aquatic animals is composed of proteins. Since the proteins, however, are very complicated and highly polymerised compounds, it is difficult to catch minute variations in the structure of the proteins.
The polarographic wave of each protein may be particular to the protein itself. Consequently, polarography is a very excellent method in learning the characteristic property of each protein. Since we have wanted for quite some time to use the polarographic method in studies on the quality of foods, we have adopted the polarography in order to confirm the difference of the polarographic behaviors of the proteins in meats of aquatic animals more quickly and exactly than the methods used before.
To 1 gram of crushed meat, 100ml of distilled water was added. After centrifugation, various amounts of the supernatant solution were used for the estimation of the polarographic waves of the proteins. The protein waves were estimated in a buffer with the following composition at 25°C: 0.001M·CoCl
2, 0.1M·NH
4Cl, and 0.2M·NH
4OH. Under these conditions, we have examined the influences of the protein concentrations on the protein waves obtained from the water extracts of the meats in the aquatic animals of 85 species. The results of the experiment mentioned above are as follows:
From differences in the shapes of their protein waves obtained here, 85 species of the aquatic animals are classified into the following four groups:
Group I gives the protein wave that a single protein wave is shown and the second maximum wave is very indistinct. 19 species, such as sardine, mackerel, saurel, saury, etc., belong to this group.
Group II gives the protein wave that the height of the second wave is very lower than that of the first wave and the second minimum wave is very low. 25 species, such as sillago, perch, wreath shell, pond smelt, etc., belong to this group.
Group III gives the protein wave that the second maximum wave and the second minimum wave are not very low. 32 species, such as flathead, hairtail, clam, scallop, etc., belong to this group.
Group IV gives the protein wave that the height of the second wave is higher than that of the first wave. 9 species, such as prawn, abalone, oyster, corbicula, etc., belong to this group.
When we use cleverly the crossing points which are obtained from the relation between the heights of the protein waves and the protein concentrations, the qualities in the meats of 85 species of aquatic animals may be discriminated by their protein waves in a certain extent.
View full abstract