In 1962 Chinard and Enns suggested that as an application of the Stewart and Hamilton's theory, pulmonary extravascular water volume was able to measure by two indicator dilution curves: One is that of
3H-water which can be diffusible through the pulmonary capillary and the other is that of
131I-albumin which is non-diffusible.
Although several investigators calculated the pulmonary extravascular water volume from two indicator diluton curves as
Falb⋅Δtm there is one more possibility of calculation:
FTHO⋅
tTHO⋅
Falb⋅
talb. (
Falb.: pulmonary flow calculated from
131I-alb. dilution curve.
FTHO: pulmonary flow from THO dilution curve.
talb:
131I-alb. mean transit time.
tTHO: THO transit time.)
Using 73 mongrel dogs on several conditions (see Tab. 1) this report was objected to investigate which calculation method was more proper from the stand- point of reproducibility and of relationship between isotope dilution value and gravimetric (postmortem) value (Pearce).
1) The rsults of five times measurements on one dog:
FTHO⋅
tTHO-
Falb.⋅
talb.averaged 4.5m
l/kg, % maximal deviation of it was 20.5%, % average deviation 9.6% and cofficient of variation 12.7%, while
Falb.⋅Δ
tm average 3.7m
l/kg, % maximal devation 60.9%, % average deviation 29.1% and coefficient of variation 30.8%.
2) The results of duplicate measurements on 9 dogs:
FTHO⋅
tTHO-
Falb.⋅talb. averaged 4.5m
l/kg, % maximal deviation of it was 25.7%, % average devaition 7.6 %, and coefficient of variation 24.7%, while
Falb.⋅Δ
tm averaged 3.8m
l/kg, % maximal deviation 55.4%, % average deviation 19.1% and coefficient of variation 28.9%.
These data shown that reproducibility was better in
FTHO⋅
tTHO-
Falb⋅
talb than in
Falb.⋅Δ
tm3) Comparison between gravimetric (postmortem) extravascular water volume and isotope dilution value:
FTHO⋅
tTHO-
Falb.⋅
talb. value against postmortem value was 0.85±0.16 (
r=0.77,
p<0.01,
y=0.92+0.77) in group III. It was 0.94±0.08 (
r=0.844,
p<0.01,
y=0.97+0.52) in group IV, 0.92±0.06 (
r=0.885, 0.01<
p<0.05,
y=0.73+1.79) in group V, and 0.84 ±0.04 (
r=0.849, 0.01<
p<0.05,
y=1.26-0.58) in group VI.
Falb.⋅Δ
tm against postmortem value was 0.66±0.23 (
r=0.402,
p>0.05) in group III, 0.71±0.13 (
r=0.694, 0.01<
p<0.05) in group IV, 0.64±0.20 (
r=0.543,
p>0.05) in group V, and 0.57±0.17 (
r=0.412,
p>0.05) in group VI.
These data shown that the pulmonary extravascular water volume calculated as
FTHO⋅
tTHO-
Falb.⋅
talb. had better correlation with post mortem value than that calculated as
Falb⋅Δ
tmThese all data suggested that
FTHO⋅
tTHO-
Falb⋅talb was more proper than
Falb⋅Δ
tm in calculating pulmonary extravascular water volume by double indicator dilution method.
抄録全体を表示