The low-contrast detectability of computed tomography (CT) images is commonly evaluated by the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) because of its convenience to measure. However, the correlation between CNR and visual detectability is poor because the CNR is a simple index determined by both the contrast of the object and the standard deviation of the image noise. On the other hand, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), especially SNR based on the statistical decision theory model (SNR_{S, D}) and SNR based on the matched-filter model (SNR_M) are considered superior to CNR. In this study, we investigated a new physical image quality index for evaluating low-contrast detectability (SNR_A), which is approximately derived from SNR_{S, D} and SNR_M. The new index, which was calculated using the object size, contrast of the object and the noise power spectrum, provided good approximations when the diameter of the rod object was equal and >5 mm. The diameter dependency of the SNR_A was also found to provide better sensitivity than the sensitivities of CNR and object-specific CNR, similar to SNR_{S, D} and SNR_M. The results suggested that the proposed convenient index should be useful for evaluating the low-contrast detectability of CT images.

The normal tube voltage in computed tomography colonography (CTC) is 120 kV. Some reports indicate that the use of a low tube voltage (lower than 120 kV) technique plays a significant role in reduction of radiation dose. However, to determine whether a lower tube voltage can reduce radiation dose without compromising diagnostic accuracy, an evaluation of images that are obtained while maintaining the volume CT dose index (CTDI_vol) is required. This study investigated the effect of reduced tube voltage in CTC, without modifying radiation dose (i.e. constant CTDI_vol), on image quality. Evaluation of image quality involved the shape of the noise power spectrum, surface profiling with volume rendering (VR), and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The shape of the noise power spectrum obtained with a tube voltage of 80 kV and 100 kV was not similar to the one produced with a tube voltage of 120 kV. Moreover, a higher standard deviation was observed on volume-rendered images that were generated using the reduced tube voltages. In addition, ROC analysis revealed a statistically significant drop in diagnostic accuracy with reduced tube voltage, revealing that the modification of tube voltage affects volume-rendered images. The results of this study suggest that reduction of tube voltage in CTC, so as to reduce radiation dose, affects image quality and diagnostic accuracy.

The first diagnostic reference levels (DRLs 2015) in Japan were published in June 2015. The purpose of this study was to compare the calculated entrance surface doses with the values of DRLs 2015, and evaluate differences in patient exposure among facilities. Semiconductor dosimeter was installed, and dosimetry was performed using equipment and radiographic condition of each facility. As a result, a dose higher than the value of DRLs 2015 was used in 12 kinds of examination. In child chest examination, the doses of the three facilities (0.26 mGy, 0.28 mGy, 0.60 mGy) exceeded the value of DRLs 2015 (0.2 mGy). Review of the radiographic condition is necessary because the doses exceeding DRLs 2015 tended to have a high current time product. The examination with the largest difference between facilities was the lateral of thoracic spine, with a difference of about 46 times, and the examination with the smallest difference was the ankle joint, with a difference of about three times. When reviewing, it is necessary to focus mainly on examinations that have a large difference between facilities. In the future, it can be said that it is necessary to set diagnostic reference range (DRR) or achievable dose (AD) to understand how high or low dose of the own facility are compared with facilities nationwide.